Language selection

Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

Search


Review of a Specialized Program Under the Foreign Intelligence Aspect of CSE’s Mandate

Review of a Specialized Program Under the Foreign Intelligence Aspect of CSE’s Mandate


Last Updated:

Status:

Published

Review Number:

21-06

Share this page
Date Modified:

Strategic Plan 2024-2027

Date of Publishing:

Introduction

Without specialized national security review, much security service conduct would be immunized from scrutiny by reason of national security secrecy. NSIRA’s raison d’être is to ensure that there is no such immunity. NSIRA’s statute gives it two core mandates: conducting national security “reviews” of activities in the security and intelligence area; and conducting “investigations” of complaints brought against a subset of national security and intelligence services.

The review and investigation process serves to guard values essential to the Canadian project, including (especially) the rule of law: the notion that no one is above the law, and that a public official (including in the security and intelligence services) can only   exercise powers found in the law. At the same time, NSIRA’s work “stress tests” the national security and intelligence community aiming to make them better as institutions at meeting their mandates.

The Strategic Plan lays out the NSIRA’s strategic goals and objectives in the further pursuit of excellence in national security review and complaints investigations. This roadmap comprises four key areas and reflects NSIRA’s unwavering commitment to   independence, professionalism, transparency and inclusiveness. The Agency’s dedication to adapting to evolving challenges and innovate is demonstrated by its focus on technological advancement, robust security protocols, continuous learning, and streamlined internal services.

This strategic plan is not a fixed document but a living blueprint, guiding NSIRA in
enhancing its existing commitment to accountability, and effectiveness. Each goal and
objective stems from NSIRA’s mission to remain the trusted eyes and ears of
Canadians in the evolving landscape of security and intelligence activities.

Vision, Mission, Values

Strategic Goals

Rigorous Reviews

NSIRA recognizes its pivotal role in conducting thorough and impactful national security and intelligence activities reviews. By focusing on contemporary and evolving topical issues, and employing relevant methodologies and rigorous analysis, NSIRA ensures that its reviews, in aggregate, comprehensively assess these critical activities’ legality, reasonability, and necessity. The commitment to maintaining the highest review standards is a prerequisite to serving as a trusted institution for Canadians. NSIRA’s reviews offer valuable findings and recommendations to stakeholders and decision-makers and inform Canadian society in a transparent manner that supports effective democracy and government accountability.

Efficient Complaint Investigations

The focus on fair and efficient investigations underscores the agency’s commitment to
procedural fairness and impartiality, but also to access to justice principles that meaningfully empower complainants to be heard in a timely way and to see their matter investigated without delay. NSIRA diligently gathers and analyzes evidence, adhering to established investigative protocols and quasi-judicial best practices. The result is enhanced public trust and a robust contribution to upholding the rule of law.

Sustainable Corporate Infrastructure

Recognizing that rigorous reviews and effective investigations depend on mission support in the form of robust corporate and institutional infrastructure, NSIRA invests in cutting-edge technologies, specialized expertise, continuous learning, and a culture of collaboration. This ensures that information management and technology systems are optimized, that security postures reflect the highest standards, that human resources recruit and retain a workforce that is highly skilled, and that compliance to standard and financial management of the agency is efficient and agile. By providing a workplace that meets the highest expectations, NSIRA positions itself as capable of adapting to evolving challenges and making sustainable contributions to national security accountability.

Engaged Domestic and International Communities of Practice

NSIRA acknowledges the complexity of national security review challenges and the need for a collaborative approach. The emphasis on cooperation and engagement with domestic and international partners strengthens the effectiveness of reviews and investigations. In addition, by actively seeking opportunities to collaborate with Canadian and international accountability institutions, NSIRA contributes to developing global national security and intelligence review standards. The Agency becomes a vital participant in shaping the discourse on security, both at home and on the international stage. It becomes a recognized global centre of excellence in national security accountability and a global and national hub for a “community of review professionals”. NSIRA also continues to be a “learning organization”, drawing best practices from other bodies and jurisdictions into its own processes and procedures.

Objectives

Strategic Goal 1: Rigorous Reviews (R)

  1. R 1. Maintain independence, strong ethical standards and professionalism.
  2. R 2. Enhance review relevance through objective selection and prioritization criteria.
  3. R 3.Enhance review quality, in terms of depth, clarity, drafting and conciseness, including through key performance indicators.
  4. R 4.Enhance review production levels, including by developing processes that sustain a yearly production of 12 reviews.
  5. R 5.Develop mechanisms promoting reviewee’s responsiveness to review requirements, including through communications with agencies and escalation of issues up to ministerial level.
  6. R 6. Maintain transparency and pursue accessibility to the review work.
  7. R 7. Increase accountability through tracking, dissemination and follow-up of NSIRA’s findings and recommendations.
  8. R 8. Innovate review methodology through the development of new review tools with an emphasis on technology and sustainability.
  9. R 9.Maintain an evergreen review process which guides all aspects of NSIRA review.
  10. R 10. Employ appropriately skilled review teams.

Strategic Goal 2: Efficient Complaints Investigations (I)

  1. I 1. Enhance procedures and investigative protocols to maximize efficient and expeditious investigations while adhering to principles of procedural fairness and independence and the highest standards of professionalism.
  2. I 2. Maintain protocols for triaging investigations and establish key performance indicators for the efficient and prompt conduct of investigations.
  3. I 3. Implement advanced case management solutions that leverage automation and data analytics to enhance the efficiency of investigative workflows and track key performance indicators.
  4. I 4. Develop and implement standardized protocols for handling, analyzing, and storing digital evidence, ensuring a consistent and technologically advanced approach.
  5. I 5. Ensure accessibility of the rules of procedure and of the important legal precedents in a manner that enables “equity of arms” between the government and potential complainants and enhances access to justice.
  6. I 6. Increase accountability through tracking, dissemination and follow-up of NSIRA’s findings and recommendations.
  7. I 7. Move to integrate new streams of complaints into the investigation process in a fair and efficient manner, including by adopting novel approaches enabling investigation of high-volume complaints.

Strategic Goal 3: Sustainable Corporate Infrastructure (C)

  1. C 1. Explore best avenues to optimize NSIRA’s legislative governance structure and prepare for such change.
  2. C 2. Establish strategic planning process to guide institutional priorities, use of resources and deployment of activities.
  3. C 3. Implement mechanisms promoting innovation, personnel development, retention and wellbeing and demonstrating personnel diversity and expertise in recruitment, training and retention.
  4. C 4. Develop and implement means for insights and ideas generated through domestic and international stakeholders to be shared and internalized within NSIRA, ensuring that NSIRA remains a “learning organization”.
  5. C 5. Ensure the implementation of, and reliance on, the communication strategy.
  6. C 6. Develop and implement holistic information management infrastructure that supports current activities and allows for collecting, storing, retrieving and deleting information.
  7. C 7. Continue to strengthen security measures, including access controls, cyber security, surveillance systems, and facility security, to safeguard NSIRA’s premises, assets and employees.
  8. C 8. Implement measures to streamline administrative processes, reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies and enhancing the speed and accuracy of internal operations.
  9. C 9. Invest in technology upgrades and innovations to modernize internal systems, ensuring that NSIRA leverages cutting-edge tools for improved operational efficiency.
  10. C 10. Optimize and implement technologies that facilitate secure and efficient remote work options, and regional access, ensuring flexibility and inclusiveness in NSIRA’s workforce.

Strategic Goal 4: Engaged Domestic and International Communities of
Practice (E)

  1. E 1. Formulate and implement a comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategy with domestic review bodies and agents of Parliament, international review community, media and academic community.
  2. E 2. Formulate and implement a comprehensive media relations and communications strategy that assists media in reporting meaningfully and accurately on NSIRA’s work.
  3. E 3. Play an active role in developing global, national security and intelligence review standards by participating in international forums and collaborative initiatives.
  4. E 4. Develop and implement initiatives to enhance awareness and understanding of NSIRA’s role, objectives, and impact among external stakeholders, including the public, government officials, and other review/oversight bodies.
  5. E 5. Continue to enhance staff-level expertise building through training and education initiatives, both internal and external, and ensure that these opportunities are broadly shared.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Quarterly Report: For the quarter ended June 30, 2025

Quarterly Report: For the quarter ended June 30, 2025


Date of Publishing:

Introduction

This quarterly report has been prepared by management as required by section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act and in the form and manner prescribed by the Directive on Accounting Standards, GC 4400 Departmental Quarterly Financial Report. This quarterly financial report should be read in conjunction with the 2025–2026 Main Estimates.

This quarterly report has not been subject to an external audit or review.

Mandate

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) is an independent external review body that reports to Parliament. Established in July 2019, NSIRA reviews Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to assess whether they are lawful, reasonable, and necessary. The Agency also investigates complaints from members of the public on the activities of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), as well as certain other national security-related complaints, independently and in a timely manner.

The NSIRA Secretariat supports the Agency in the delivery of its mandate. Independent scrutiny contributes to strengthening the accountability framework for national security and intelligence activities and to enhancing public confidence. Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable, and necessary.

A summary description NSIRA’s program activities can be found in Part II of the Main Estimates. Information on NSIRA’s mandate can be found on its website.

Basis of presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the agency’s spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the agency, consistent with the 2025–2026 Main Estimates. This quarterly report has been prepared using a special-purpose financial reporting framework (cash basis) designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before money can be spent by the government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authorities for specific purposes.

Highlights of the fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date results

This section highlights the significant items that contributed to the net increase or decrease in authorities available for the year and actual expenditures for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

NSIRA Secretariat spent approximately 22% of its authorities by the end of the first quarter, compared with 19% in the same quarter of 2024–2025 (see graph 1).

Graph 1: Comparison of total authorities and total net budgetary expenditures, Q1 2025–2026 and Q1 2024–2025

Significant changes to authorities

As of June 30, 2025, Parliament had approved $19.6 million in total authorities for use by NSIRA Secretariat for 2025–2026 compared with $18.4 million as of June 30, 2024, for a net increase of $1.2 million or 6.5% (see graph 2).

Graph 2: Variance in authorities as at June 30, 2025

The increase of $1.2 million in authorities is mostly explained by top-ups for updated collective bargaining agreements.

Significant changes to quarter expenditures

The first quarter expenditures totalled $4.4 million for an increase of $0.9 million when compared with $3.5 million spent during the same period in 2024–2025. Table 1 presents budgetary expenditures by standard object.

Table 1

*Details may not sum to totals due to rounding
Variances in expenditures by standard object
(in thousands of dollars)
Fiscal year 2025-26: expended during the quarter ended June 30, 2025 Fiscal year 2024-25: expended during the quarter ended June 30, 2024 Variance $ Variance %
Personnel 4,070 3,008 1,062 35%
Transportation and communications 46 58 -12 -21%
Information 0 6 -6 -100%
Professional and special services 270 269 1 0%
Rentals 1 25 -24 -96%
Repair and maintenance 16 3 13 433%
Utilities, materials, and supplies 4 28 -24 -86%
Acquisition of machinery and equipment 0 12 -12 -100%
Other subsidies and payments 2 79 -77 -97%
Total gross budgetary expenditures 4,409 3,488 921 26%

Personnel

The increase of $1,062,000 is explained by increases in average salaries due to updated collective bargaining agreements and an increase in FTEs.

Rentals

The decrease of $24,000 is explained by the elimination of temporary office space.

Repair and maintenance

The increase of $13,000 is explained by the need for some minor building repairs in 2025-26.

Utilities, materials, and supplies

The decrease of $24,000 is explained by unreconciled acquisition card purchases in 2024-25.

Acquisition of machinery and equipment

The increase of $12,000 is explained by several one-time equipment purchases in 2024-25.

Other subsidies and payments

The decrease of $77,000 is explained by a decrease in salary overpayments.

Risks and uncertainties

The funding received to offset pay increases was insufficient to cover such increases and as a result, NSIRA Secretariat will be required to reduce its overall staffing level to remain within budget. Reductions in staffing could cause a reduction in the number of reviews and investigations the Secretariat is able to produce on a yearly basis.

NSIRA Secretariat is closely monitoring pay transactions to identify and address over and under payments in a timely manner and continues to apply ongoing mitigating controls.

Mitigation measures for the risks outlined above have been identified and are factored into NSIRA Secretariat’s approach and timelines for the execution of its mandated activities.

Significant changes in relation to operations, personnel and programs

There have been no changes to the NSIRA Secretariat Program.

Approved by senior officials:

Charles Fugère
Executive Director

Amanda Wark
A/Chief Financial Officer

Appendix

Statement of authorities (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

Fiscal year 2025-2026 Fiscal year 2024-2025
Total available for use for the year ending March 31,
2026 (note 1)
Used during the quarter ended June 30, 2025 Year to date used at quarter-end Total available for use for the year ending March 31,
2025 (note 1)
Used during the quarter ended June 30, 2024 Year to date used at quarter-end
Vote 1 – Net operating expenditures 17,697 3,932 3,932 16,810 3,088 3,088
Budgetary statutory authorities
Contributions to employee benefit plans 1,908 477 477 1,601 400 400
Total Budgetary authorities (note 2) 19,605 4,409 4,409 18,411 3,488 3,488

Note 1: Includes only authorities available for use and granted by Parliament as at quarter-end.

Note 2: Details may not sum to totals due to rounding.

Departmental budgetary expenditures by standard object (unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

Fiscal year 2025-2026 Fiscal year 2024-2025
Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2026
2026 (note 1)
Expended during the quarter ended June 30, 2025 Year to date used at quarter-end Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2025 Expended during the quarter ended June 30, 2024 Year to date used at quarter-end
Expendituers
Personnel 14,377 4,070 4,070 13,205 3,008 3,008
Transportation and communications 497 46 46 685 58 58
Information 42 0 0 76 6 6
Professional and special services 4,169 270 270 3,577 269 269
Rentals 281 1 1 309 25 25
Repair and maintenance 72 16 16 436 3 3
Utilities, materials, and supplies 74 4 4 58 28 28
Acquisition of machinery and equipment 93 0 0 65 12 12
Other subsidies and payments 0 2 2 0 79 79
Total gross budgetary expenditures (note 2) 19,605 4,409 4,409 18,411 3,488 3,488

Note 1: Includes only authorities available for use and granted by Parliament as at quarter-end.

Note 2: Details may not sum to totals due to rounding.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Review of Select Government of Canada Research Security Measures

Review of Select Government of Canada Research Security Measures


Last Updated:

Status:

In Progress

Review Number:

25-07

Share this page
Date Modified:

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information


Last Updated:

Status:

Published

Review Number:

19-03 (08-501-3)

Share this page
Date Modified:

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information: Report

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information


Report

Table of Contents

Date of Publishing:

HTML Version Coming Soon

Our team is working on an HTML version of this content to enhance usability and compatibility across devices. We aim to make it available in the near future. Thank you for your patience!

Share this page
Date Modified:

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information: Backgrounder

Review of the Communications Security Establishment’s Disclosures of Canadian Identifying Information


Backgrounder

Backgrounder

Early after its inception, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) conducted a review of how the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) shares Canadian Identifying Information (CII), such as names, email addresses, and IP addresses. This review focused on disclosures made to other Government of Canada departments. After many efforts to produce a declassified version of the report, NSIRA is now able to publish this review’s final report in redacted form.

When CSE gathers foreign signals intelligence, it removes any identifying information about Canadians and persons in Canada from its reports to protect privacy. However, government departments or foreign partners can request this information if they have legal authority and a valid operational reason.

NSIRA examined a sample of these disclosures made between July 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019. This included cases where CSE was assisting the Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s (CSIS) foreign intelligence collection under section 16 of the CSIS Act.

NSIRA found, based on the sample of disclosures it examined, that while CSE approved 99% of requests for CII disclosure from its domestic partners, 28% of all requests were not sufficiently justified to warrant the release of CII. NSIRA concluded that CSE’s implementation of the CII disclosure regime lacked rigour, and may not have complied with its responsibilities under the Privacy Act. As a result, NSIRA issued a compliance report under section 35 of the NSIRA Act.

NSIRA also found that CSE’s releases of CII collected under section 16 of the CSIS Act were conducted in a manner that was unlikely to have been communicated to the Federal Court by CSIS. CSIS had provided the Federal Court with testimony about its treatment of information about Canadians collected through section 16 of the CSIS Act. Yet, when NSIRA compared this testimony with how CSE handled information about Canadians collected when assisting CSIS in relation to section 16, NSIRA found notable discrepancies in the standards communicated to the Federal Court. CSIS was not involved in assessing or releasing the disclosures about which NSIRA had concerns; these disclosures were handled solely by CSE.

The report contains 11 recommendations, primarily focused on enhancing the rigour of CSE’s CII disclosure regime, including with respect to CII collected under section 16 of the CSIS Act.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Departmental Plan: 2025-2026

Departmental Plan: 2025-2026


Date of Publishing:

From the Executive Director

I am pleased to present the 2025–26 Departmental Plan for the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat. This plan outlines the key priorities and objectives we will pursue in the coming year to support NSIRA’s critical work in ensuring accountability and public confidence in national security and intelligence activities.

The Secretariat’s role is to provide the expertise, resources, and support necessary for NSIRA to fulfill its mandate effectively. As we move forward, our focus remains on fostering a culture of professionalism, transparency, and continuous improvement. This commitment underpins all aspects of our work, from supporting independent reviews to facilitating timely and fair investigations.

The year ahead presents opportunities to strengthen our processes and refine how we deliver on our responsibilities. By building on the knowledge gained through past work, enhancing internal capabilities, and fostering collaboration with our partners, the Secretariat aims to ensure that NSIRA continues to deliver meaningful and high-quality results.

While challenges remain, including the complexity of accessing necessary information and managing procedural unpredictability, the Secretariat is committed to addressing these issues with diligence and care. Through clear communication, proactive engagement, and a steadfast focus on service standards, we will work to mitigate risks and achieve our planned results.

Our success is made possible by the dedication and professionalism of the Secretariat team. I am grateful for their continued efforts to support NSIRA’s mandate and to contribute to an accountable and transparent national security framework. I encourage you to review this Departmental Plan for more details on the priorities we have set and the results we aim to achieve in the year ahead.

Charles Fugère
Executive Director
National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat

Plans to deliver on core responsibilities and internal services

Core responsibilities and internal services:

  • Core responsibility 1: National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations
  • Internal services

Core responsibility 1: National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations

Description

NSIRA reviews Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to assess whether they are lawful, reasonable, and necessary. NSIRA also investigates complaints from members of the public on the activities of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), as well as certain other national security-related complaints, independently and in a timely manner.

The NSIRA Secretariat supports the Agency in the delivery of its mandate. Independent scrutiny contributes to strengthening the accountability framework for national security and intelligence activities and to enhancing public confidence. Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable, and necessary.

Quality of life impacts

The NSIRA Secretariat’s core responsibility relates most closely to the indicator ‘confidence in institutions, within the ‘democracy and institutions’ subdomain and under the overarching domain of ‘good governance’.

Indicators, results and targets

This section presents details on the department’s indicators, the actual results from the three most recently reported fiscal years, the targets and target dates approved in 2020-21 for National security and intelligence reviews and complaint investigations. Details are presented by departmental result.

Table 1: Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable, and necessary.

Table 1 provides a summary of the target and actual results for each indicator associated with the results under National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations.

Indicator Actual Results Target Date to achieve
All mandatory reviews are completed on an annual basis 2021–22: 100%
2022–23: 100%
2023–24: 100%
100% completion of mandatory reviews December 2022
Reviews of national security or intelligence activities of at least five departments or agencies are conducted each year 2021–22: 100%
2022–23: 100%
2023–24: 100%
At least one national security or intelligence activity is reviewed in at least five departments or agencies annually December 2022
All Member-approved high priority national security or intelligence activities are reviewed over a three-year period 2021–22: 33%
2022–23: 33%
2023–24: 33%
100% completion over three years; at least 33% completed each year December 2022

Table 2: National security-related complaints are independently investigated in a timely manner

Indicator Actual Results Target Date to achieve
Percentage of investigations completed within the NSIRA Secretariat service standards 2021–22: N/A
2022–23: N/A
2023–24: 100%
90% – 100% March 2024

Additional information on the detailed results and performance information  for the NSRIA Secretariat’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

Plans to achieve results

The following section describes the planned results for National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations in 2025-26.

Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary.

Results we plan to achieve
  • Review work will be informed and guided by the knowledge and experience acquired through previous reviews, and this increased understanding of departments and agencies’ organizational structures, networks, policies, and activities will be leveraged and applied to both the selection and execution of our reviews.
  • All current and ongoing reviews, and new reviews beginning in 2025-26, will be conducted with the highest degree of rigour and professionalism. This will include all mandatory and discretionary reviews, including annual reviews of CSIS and CSE activities.
  • Review reports, which capture the detailed results and outcomes of our reviews, will be produced and provided to applicable Ministers and departments, including all findings, and recommendations produced during the review.
  • All review reports will be prepared for public release as a result of Access to Information requests and also published on the NSIRA website, allowing Canadians to see the outcomes and conclusions of NSIRA’s work, which assesses whether the national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary.
  • To further support its review efforts, the Secretariat will continue to leverage and foster its bilateral and multilateral international and domestic partnerships in the review and oversight community. Such participation and engagement expand the knowledge and experience base of the Secretariat through the sharing of best practices. It also allows the Secretariat to grow NSIRA’s visibility globally and sets up Canada amongst the industry leaders in review and oversight.
Results we plan to achieve
  • The Secretariat will revise and amend NSIRA’s Rules of Procedure and Standard Operating Procedures for complaint investigations. These revisions will allow for consistency with developed best practices and ensure the continued modernization of its processes.
  • The Secretariat will develop a simplified procedure to support NSIRA in addressing large volumes of particular types of complaint allegations, or individual complaints requiring a narrower evidentiary scope to in turn promote timeliness, efficiency, and procedural fairness.
  • The Secretariat will continue the development and integration of a multi-disciplined work environment composed of necessary expertise to enhance the professionalization of NSIRA’s investigations and investigative processes.
  • The Secretariat will leverage its strong relationships with partners to commence work on developing procedures for all phases of the investigation of complaints against the RCMP and CBSA related to national security in preparation for the eventual coming into force of the PCRC Act, and this will include the completion of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Civilian Review and Complainants Commission (CRCC) / the PCRC.
  • The Secretariat will also leverage those relationships as it prepares to support the new PCRC with its statutory obligation under the PCRC Act to report race-based and other demographic data related to complaints against the RCMP and the CBSA, namely by ensuring that NSIRA consistently reports, as necessary, on such data for complaints referred to it by the PCRC.
Key risks

The NSIRA Secretariat has made progress on accessing the information required to conduct reviews; however, there continues to be risk associated with reviewees’ ability to respond to and prioritize information requests, or to provide necessary access to required information during reviews, thereby hindering NSIRA’s ability to deliver its reviews on a faster turnaround.  The NSIRA Secretariat will continue to mitigate these risks by providing clear communication related to information requests, tracking their timely completion within communicated timelines and escalating issues when appropriate.

With respect to the Secretariat’s service standards, one risk to the achievement of the planned results for complaint investigations is the procedural unpredictability of NSIRA’s investigations due to the quasi-judicial nature of the investigation process and the institutional independence of individual NSIRA members in the conduct of their investigations.

Additionally, procedural unpredictability may result in some investigations becoming more protracted than others depending on the complexity of the complaint that NSIRA must address. 

Finally, there is a risk to the timeliness of complaint investigations due to the responses from the respondent agencies and organizations whose activities are the subject of complaints.  The timely provision of documents and the availability of individuals for interviews, by both the complainant and respondent agency, is necessary for NSIRA to conduct investigations in a timely manner and for the Secretariat to meet its service standards. Similar to NSIRA’s reviews, there continues to be a risk that government party respondents will not provide NSIRA with the documentary evidence it requires within the deadlines set by NSIRA. The is illustrated in ongoing litigation efforts against NSIRA’s access rights. The Secretariat will continue to support NSIRA in communicating expectations and deadlines clearly and consistently to parties and to coordinate NSIRA representation before the federal court in associated litigation matters.

Planned resources to achieve results

Table 3: Planned resources to achieve results for National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations

Table 3 provides a summary of the planned spending and full-time equivalents required to achieve results.

Resource Planned
Spending $11,280,435
Full-time equivalents 69

Complete financial and human resources information for the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals

The NSIRA Secretariat’s contributes to implementing the 2030 Agenda and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Through its Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy for 2023-2027, the NSIRA Secretariat supports SDGs 10 (Reduced Inequalities), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action) by ensuring that its operations and activities align with principles of sustainability, social equity, and environmental responsibility. The Secretariat’s initiatives aim to foster a balanced approach to sustainable development while contributing to Canada’s progress in achieving the global SDG targets.

More information on the NSIRA Secretariat’s contributions to Canada’s Federal Implementation Plan on the 2030 Agenda and the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy can be found in our Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy.

Program inventory

National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations are supported by the following program in the program inventory:

  • National security and intelligence activity reviews and complaints investigations.

Supporting information on planned expenditures, human resources, and results related to the NSIRA Secretariat’s program inventory is available on GC Infobase.

Internal services

Description

Internal services are the services that are provided within a department so that it can meet its corporate obligations and deliver its programs. There are 9 categories of internal services:

  • management and oversight services
  • communications services
  • human resources management services
  • financial management services
  • information management services
  • information technology services
  • real property management services
  • materiel management services
  • acquisition management services

Plans to achieve results

This section presents details on how the department plans to achieve results and meet targets for internal services.

Efficient Resource Deployment and Operational Support

In 2025–26, the NSIRA Secretariat will continue to take steps to ensure resources are deployed in the most effective and efficient manner possible, and its operations and administrative structures, tools, and processes continue to focus on supporting the delivery of its priorities. The NSIRA Secretariat will work to formalize and document some key policies, directives and guidelines for the finance and procurement operations.

Strategic Human Resources Focus

HR services play a pivotal role in achieving organizational goals by fostering a high performing, engaged, and adaptable workforce. The HR strategic focus emphasizes enhancing processes through innovative talent acquisition, employee development, and retention strategies aligned with the organization’s mission and values. Revamped developmental programs, tailored training opportunities, mentorship initiatives, and clear pathways for professional growth ensure employees are well-equipped to meet evolving needs. Furthermore, the NSIRA Secretariat has made notable progress in employee retention, driven by a commitment to a positive workplace culture These efforts, along with wellness initiatives, and a collaborative culture, enhance job satisfaction and long-term retention, enabling the organization to thrive.

Enhancing Collaboration and Accessibility

There are plans to revamp our internal systems to improve collaboration and enhance information accessibility across teams. Additionally, we will optimize the NSIRA’s external website to ensure better accessibility and alignment with organizational objectives. These efforts are designed to streamline information-sharing practices, increase operational efficiency, and foster a more connected and collaborative work environment. Through these plans, the NSIRA Secretariat will enhance both internal and external communications, ensuring that technology supports the department’s broader goals.

Modernizing Information Management and Archival Practices

The NSIRA Secretariat plans to establish comprehensive archival management and compliance standards for the physical archive to meet both regulatory and organizational requirements. A key focus will be the modernization of information management policy instruments, ensuring that data handling and storage practices align with contemporary best practices in the field. During 2025-2026, the NSIRA Secretariat will implement its new Disposition Authority, which will guide the retention and disposal of records in accordance with established guidelines. Additionally, a targeted approach will be taken to strengthen the use of GCdocs, enhancing its capabilities for effective information management across the NSIRA Secretariat. These efforts will ensure robust operations and provide the necessary structure to support efficient information governance.

Strengthening Risk Management Frameworks

To strengthen the department’s risk management capabilities, the plan includes the ongoing implementation and updating of security controls and risk-based procedures to ensure their continued relevance and resilience in the face of emerging threats. This will be supported by the strengthening of the internal risk program framework, including the development of more effective tools to assess, manage, and mitigate risks across the organization. By enhancing these risk management strategies, the NSIRA Secretariat will be better equipped to safeguard its operations and assets, while fostering a culture of proactive risk management that supports the achievement of organizational objectives.

Planned resources to achieve results

Table 4: Planned resources to achieve results for internal services this year

Table 4 provides a summary of the planned spending and full-time equivalents required to achieve results.

Resource Planned
Spending $8,164,617
Full-time equivalents 31

Complete financial and human resources information for the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

Planning for contracts awarded to Indigenous businesses

Government of Canada departments are to meet a target of awarding at least 5% of the total value of contracts to Indigenous businesses each year. This commitment is to be fully implemented by the end of 2024-25.

As part of the government-wide phased approach, the NSIRA Secretariat is progressing toward this goal. Efforts are already well underway in support of the Government of Canada’s commitment, which requires that at least 5% of the total value of contracts be awarded to Indigenous businesses annually.

In 2023–24, the NSIRA Secretariat was well on its way to achieving the 5% goal by 2024–25, having reached 3%, as shown in Table 5. Measures to meet the mandatory target include increasing the number of contracts set aside for Indigenous businesses under the Procurement Strategy for Indigenous Business over the next three fiscal years.

Table 5: Percentage of contracts planned and awarded to Indigenous businesses

Table 5 presents the current, actual results with forecasted and planned results for the total percentage of contracts the department awarded to Indigenous businesses.

5% Reporting Field 2023–24 Actual Result 2024–25 Forecasted Result 2025–26 Planned Result
Total percentage of contracts with Indigenous businesses 3% 5% 5%

Planned spending and human resources 

This section provides an overview of National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat’s planned spending and human resources for the next three fiscal years and compares planned spending for 2025-26 with actual spending from previous years.

Spending

This section presents an overview of the department’s planned expenditures from 2022-23 to 2027-28.

Graph 1 Planned spending by core responsibility in 2025-26

Graph 1 presents how much the department plans to spend in 2025-26 to carry out core responsibilities and internal services.

Graph 1 presents how much the department plans to spend in 2025-26 to carry out core responsibilities and internal services.

Graph 1 is a bar graph that demonstrates how much the department plans to spend on core responsibilities and internal services by year from 2022-23 through 2027-28. 

Core Responsibilities and Internal Services 2025–26 Planned Spending
National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations $11,280,435
Internal services $8,164,617

Analysis of planned spending by core responsibility

Yearly spending to carry out core responsibilities and internal services has remained steady in total as well as with respect to the ratio of statutory to voted expenditures. This is expected to remain relatively stable as the organization reaches its steady state.

Budgetary performance summary

Table 6 Three-year spending summary for core responsibilities and internal services (dollars)

Table 6 presents how much money the NSIRA Secretariat spent over the past three years to carry out its core responsibilities and for internal services. Amounts for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on spending to date.

Core Responsibilities and Internal Services 2022–23 Actual Expenditures 2023–24 Actual Expenditures 2024–25 Forecast Spending
National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations $7,756,271 $9,110,398 $11,303,742
Subtotal $7,756,271 $9,110,398 $11,303,742
Internal services $10,532,876 $10,535,328 $8,181,486
Total $18,289,147 $19,645,726 $19,485,229

Analysis of the past three years of spending

While planned spending appears to have remained constant over the last 3 years and is expected to stay the same, the composition of expenditures has changed from fiscal year 2022-23 to 2024-25. A large capital infrastructure project was underway in 2022-23 and was completed in 2023-24, inflating expenditures in internal services. Since 2022-23, we have seen a gradual increase in both ongoing O&M expenditures and salaries, due to the growth of the organization and the approach towards a steady state.

More financial information from previous years is available on the Finances section of GC Infobase.

Table 7 Planned three-year spending on core responsibilities and internal services (dollars)

Table 7 presents how much money the NSIRA Secretariat plans to spend over the next three years to carry out its core responsibilities and for internal services.

Core Responsibilities and Internal Services 2025–26 Planned Spending 2026–27 Planned Spending 2027–28 Planned Spending
National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations $11,280,435 $11,296,175 $11,296,175
Subtotal $11,280,435 $11,296,175 $11,296,175
Internal services $8,164,617 $8,176,009 $8,176,009
Total $19,445,052 $19,472,184 $19,472,184
Analysis of the next three years of spending

With the maturing of the organization, overall planned spending is expected to remain constant for the foreseeable future. The organization’s funding has been regularized, so there are no significant variances to report.

More detailed financial information on planned spending is available on the Finances section of GC Infobase.

Information on the alignment of the NSIRA Secretariat’s spending with Government of Canada’s spending and activities is available on GC InfoBase.

Funding

This section provides an overview of the department’s voted and statutory funding for its core responsibilities and for internal services. For further information on funding authorities, consult the Government of Canada budgets and expenditures.

Graph 2: Approved funding (statutory and voted) over a six-year period

Graph 2 summarizes the department’s approved voted and statutory funding from 2022-23 to 2027-28.

Graph 2 summarizes the department's approved voted and statutory funding from 2022-23 to 2027-28.

Graph 2 is a bar graph that summarizes the department’s approved voted and statutory funding from 2022-23 to 2027-28 

Fiscal Year Total Voted Statutory
2022–23 $29,791,019 $28,063,351 $1,727,668
2023–24 $24,388,394 $22,633,165 $1,755,229
2024–25 $19,458,632 $17,857,264 $1,601,368
2025–26 $19,445,052 $17,697,005 $1,748,047
2026–27 $19,472,184 $17,720,195 $1,751,989
2027–28 $19,472,184 $17,720,195 $1,751,989

Analysis of statutory and voted funding over a six-year period

With NSIRA being created in 2019, additional space was required to accommodate the intended steady state of FTEs within the organization. To address this need, a large capital infrastructure project was funded until March 2024, even though the project was completed in August 2024. This timing explains the decrease in funding in 2023–24 and again in 2024–25. From 2024–25 onward, the organization has nearly reached its anticipated steady state, which is reflected in a consistent yearly budget.

For further information on the NSIRA Secretariat’s departmental appropriations, consult the 2025-26 Main Estimates.

Future-oriented condensed statement of operations

The future-oriented condensed statement of operations provides an overview of the NSIRA Secretariat’s operations for 2024-25 to 2025-26.

Table 8 Future-oriented condensed statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2026 (dollars)

Table 8 summarizes the expenses and revenues which net to the cost of operations before government funding and transfers for 2024-25 to 2025-26. The forecast and planned amounts in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The forecast and planned amounts presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.

Financial Information 2024–25 Forecast Results 2025–26 Planned Results Difference (Planned Results minus Forecasted)
Total expenses $21,201,414 $21,394,362 $192,948
Total revenues $0 $0 $0
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers $21,201,414 $21,394,362 $192,948

Analysis of forecasted and planned results

While there are no significant variances between planned 2025-26 and forecasted 2024-25 results, small increases in both the amortization of tangible capital assets and services provided without charge are anticipated due to the completion of a large infrastructure project which was converted from an asset under construction to an asset mid-year 2024-25.

A more detailed Future-Oriented Statement of Operations and associated Notes for 2025-26, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations with the requested authorities, is available on the NSIRA Secretariat’s website.

Human resources

This section presents an overview of the department’s actual and planned human resources from 2022-23 to 2027-28. 

Table 9: Actual human resources for core responsibilities and internal services

Table 9 shows a summary of human resources, in full-time equivalents, for the NSIRA Secretariat’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for the previous three fiscal years. Human resources for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on year to date.

Core Responsibilities and Internal Services 2022–23 Actual Full-time Equivalents 2023–24 Actual Full-time Equivalents 2024–25 Forecasted Full-time Equivalents
National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations 53 51 69
Subtotal 53 51 69
Internal services 25 24 31
Total 78 75 100

Analysis of human resources over the last three years

Our full-time employee count has shown significant progress over the past year, reflecting our continued growth and commitment to expanding our organisation. The turnover rate was significantly lower this year, largely attributed to the organization’s strong commitment to fostering a healthy workplace culture for its employees. The NSIRA Secretariat has empowered its staff and managers to organize their professional responsibilities effectively. This  is complemented by efforts to implement clear organizational priorities and break down organizational silos. Additionally, the organization provides resources that promote mental and physical health, creating a supportive environment where employees feel valued. These initiatives are combined with professional growth opportunities and a collaborative culture..

Table 10: Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and internal services

Table 10 shows information on human resources, in full-time equivalents, for each of the NSIRA Secretariat’s core responsibilities and for its internal services planned for the next three years.

Core Responsibilities and Internal Services 2025–26 Planned Full-time Equivalents 2026–27 Planned Full-time Equivalents 2027–28 Planned Full-time Equivalents
National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations 69 69 69
Subtotal 69 69 69
Internal services 31 31 31
Total 31 31 31

Analysis of human resources for the next three years

The NSIRA Secretariat expects to be fully staffed as of 2025-26. Attrition is predicted to be low in the coming years, therefore, the NSIRA Secretariat projects a steady level of staffing year to year.

Corporate information

Departmental profile

Appropriate minister(s): The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada

Institutional head: Charles Fugère, Executive Director

Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office

Enabling instrument(s): National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act

Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Departmental contact information

Mailing address:

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Secretariat P.O. Box 2430, Station B

Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5W5

Email:  info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Website(s): nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Federal tax expenditures

The NSIRA Secretariat’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures.

The tax system can be used to achieve public policy objectives through the application of special measures such as low tax rates, exemptions, deductions, deferrals and credits. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for these measures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures.

This report also provides detailed background information on tax expenditures, including descriptions, objectives, historical information and references to related federal spending programs as well as evaluations and GBA Plus of tax expenditures.

Appendix: definitions

appropriation (crédit)

Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)

Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.

core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)

An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence. 

Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)

A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring. 

departmental result (résultat ministériel)

A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes. 

departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)

A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.

departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)

A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.

Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)

A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.

full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)

A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full‑time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.

gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])

Is an analytical tool used to support the development of responsive and inclusive policies, programs, and other initiatives. GBA Plus is a process for understanding who is impacted by the issue or opportunity being addressed by the initiative; identifying how the initiative could be tailored to meet diverse needs of the people most impacted; and anticipating and mitigating any barriers to accessing or benefitting from the initiative. GBA Plus is an intersectional analysis that goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences to consider other factors, such as age, disability, education, ethnicity, economic status, geography (including rurality), language, race, religion, and sexual orientation. 

Using GBA Plus involves taking a gender- and diversity-sensitive approach to our work. Considering all intersecting identity factors as part of GBA Plus, not only sex and gender, is a Government of Canada commitment. 

government priorities (priorités gouvernementales)

For the purpose of the 2025-26 Departmental Plan, government priorities are the high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the most recent Speech from the Throne.  

horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)

An initiative where two or more federal departments are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.  

Indigenous business (entreprise autochtones) 

For the purpose of the Directive on the Management of Procurement Appendix E: Mandatory Procedures for Contracts Awarded to Indigenous Businesses and the Government of Canada’s commitment that a mandatory minimum target of 5% of the total value of contracts is awarded to Indigenous businesses, a department that meets the definition and requirements as defined by the Indigenous Business Directory.   

non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)

Non-budgetary authorities that comprise assets and liabilities transactions for loans, investments and advances, or specified purpose accounts, that have been established under specific statutes or under non-statutory authorities in the Estimates and elsewhere. Non-budgetary transactions are those expenditures and receipts related to the government’s financial claims on, and obligations to, outside parties. These consist of transactions in loans, investments and advances; in cash and accounts receivable; in public money received or collected for specified purposes; and in all other assets and liabilities. Other assets and liabilities, not specifically defined in G to P authority codes are to be recorded to an R authority code, which is the residual authority code for all other assets and liabilities.

performance (rendement)

What a department did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the department intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified. 

performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)

A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.

plan (plan)

The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how a department intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result. 

planned spending (dépenses prévues)

For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates. 

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)

Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels. 

program inventory (répertoire des programmes)

Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.

result (résultat)

A consequence attributed, in part, to a department, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single department, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the department’s influence. 

statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)

Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made. 

target (cible)

A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.

voted expenditures (dépenses votées)

Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Review of Government of Canada Institutions’ Disclosures of Information Under the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act in 2023: Backgrounder

Review of Federal Institutions’ Disclosures of Information under the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act in 2023


Backgrounder

Backgrounder

The Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act (SCIDA) is intended to facilitate information sharing across government for national security purposes. Disclosures under SCIDA tend to include considerable personal information, such as passport information, citizenship status, and information gathered by diplomatic missions.

NSIRA is responsible for annually reviewing disclosures made during the previous calendar year and submits a report with its findings and recommendations to the Minister of Public Safety.

Annual reviews of disclosures by NSIRA are key to ensuring that Government of Canada (GC) institutions use SCIDA in a manner that respects the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the privacy rights of the individuals whose information is being disclosed.

This report describes the results of a review by NSIRA of SCIDA disclosures made in 2023. It was tabled in Parliament by the Minister of Public Safety, as required under subsection 39(2) of the NSIRA Act, on June 13 2025.

Since NSIRA began reviewing GC institutions’ compliance with the Act five years ago, it has made recommendations to promote higher levels of compliance among GC institutions. This has resulted in those institutions adjusting their practices and increasingly demonstrating an improved understanding of their obligations.

This year, for the first time in SCIDA’s history, NSIRA has found full compliance with the Act. As such, the report contains seven recommendations aimed at improving the practices of GC institutions to ensure that this high level of compliance is maintained.

Share this page
Date Modified: