Language selection

Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

Search


Departmental Plan: 2022-2023

Meta data information

Cat. Number: PS106-6E-PDF
ISSN: 2563-0334

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020

Date of Publishing:

From the Executive Director

I am pleased to present the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) 2022–23 Departmental Plan. This report outlines our planned activities, priorities and targeted outcomes for the 2022–23 fiscal year.

Over the past two years, NSIRA has focused on ensuring a successful and efficient transition to a much larger organization with a much broader mandate, while working on standardization and modernizing the processes that underpin our work. The agency has also increased its size and strengthened its technical and subject matter expertise.

In 2022–23, we will be implementing NSIRA’s renewed three-year review plan, which continues to emphasize reviews of increasing scale and complexity as we become familiar with the operations of departments and agencies that have only recently become subject to review. This includes reviewing activities taken under authorities granted by the National Security Act, 2017, and those that are technology- and data-collection–centric.

In the upcoming year, we will continue implementing our new process launched in 2021 for taking in and investigating complaints from members of the public. NSIRA consulted multiple key stakeholders in shaping this new process, which aims to provide greater accessibility and greater timeliness to our complaints investigation function.

As we continue to scale up our operations in 2022–2023, our priority will remain the health and safety of our staff. Some of our planned initiatives include expanding to a second site, recruiting staff across all business lines, and supporting staff and NSIRA members. Moreover, while building on our successes and pursuing ambitious organizational goals, we will maintain our focus on diversity and inclusion in the workplace, including developing an employment equity strategy.

I would like to thank the staff and members of NSIRA. They are dedicated, resilient and committed to excellence. I look forward to continuing to work with them to develop and grow the NSIRA of the future.

John Davies
Executive Director

Plans at a glance

Over the coming year, NSIRA will continue its ambitious review agenda. This will include:

  • mandatory reviews related to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act and Governor in Council directions under the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act;
  • reviews of activities undertaken under the new authorities granted to government institutions under the National Security Act, 2017; and
  • reviews of activities where technology and the collection of data are central features.

NSIRA will also continue to expand its knowledge of departments and agencies not previously subject to expert review, including through the conduct of interagency reviews.

After an extensive consultation exercise with key stakeholders and the development of new rules of procedures in 2021, NSIRA will also focus on implementing its new model for investigating complaints. Our goal is to enhance access to justice for complainants and to ensure that NSIRA investigates complaints in a timely manner.

Employee health and well-being are key to the agency’s success. In that regard, NSIRA will continue to take steps to protect the physical and mental health of its employees and help address stresses caused by the pandemic. NSIRA will focus on the implementation of initiatives aimed at improving workplace and employee well-being as well as meeting federal public service objectives for employment equity, diversity and inclusion.

For more information on NSIRA’s plans, see the “Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks” section of this plan.

Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks

This section contains information on the department’s planned results and resources for each of its core responsibilities. It also contains information on key risks related to achieving those results.

National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations

Description

NSIRA reviews Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to assess whether they are lawful, reasonable and necessary. It investigates complaints from members of the public regarding activities of CSIS, CSE or the national security activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), as well as certain other national security-related complaints. This independent scrutiny contributes to the strengthening of the framework of accountability for national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions and supports public confidence in this regard.

Planning highlights

Reviews

In support of this outcome, NSIRA will continue to implement an ambitious review agenda in 2022–23. It will review the activities of CSIS and CSE to provide responsible ministers and the Canadian public with an informed assessment of these activities, including their lawfulness, reasonableness and necessity. NSIRA will also build on the knowledge it has acquired of departments and agencies, such as the RCMP, the Canada Border Services Agency, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, and the Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces. Using that knowledge, NSIRA will ensure these organizations’ national security or intelligence activities are independently reviewed. NSIRA is committed to transcending the silos that have characterized national security review , and will “follow the thread” of an activity between agencies to ensure its assessments reflect the complex and interwoven approach Canada takes to national security.

NSIRA is committed to ensuring its review agenda remains responsive and topical. In 2022–23, in order to inform the upcoming review of the National Security Act, 2017, NSIRA will focus on the review of activities performed under authorities that were granted by virtue of this legislation. For CSIS, these include the collection and use of datasets, and the implementation of a framework for justifying activities that contravene the law that are carried out by designated employees under specific circumstances in the context of their duties and functions. For CSE, this will include the conduct of active and defensive cyber operations. Other NSIRA reviews that will contribute information in this regard are the annual reviews of the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act, of the Governor in Council directions under the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act, and of the use of measures by CSIS to reduce threats to the security of Canada.

NSIRA will continue to expand its knowledge of national security institutions by undertaking reviews in the areas of terrorist financing, foreign interference and cybersecurity. The agency will fully utilize its authorities to follow the thread of information across multiple organizations by undertaking reviews on CSIS-CSE collaboration, the efforts of both CSIS and the RCMP to address threats posed by ideologically motivated violent extremists, and the use of human sources by various departments and agencies.

Finally, NSIRA will focus on select reviews where the review of technology and data flows are central, including the collection and use of open-source intelligence at the Department of National Defence, the lifecycle of information collected under warrant by CSIS, and the retention practices of signals intelligence by CSE. NSIRA will be leveraging both internal and external technology expertise in conducting these reviews.

Outreach and collaboration

NSIRA will continue to engage with community stakeholders to understand their concerns surrounding national security and intelligence activities. NSIRA will also continue to proactively publish unclassified versions of its reports throughout the year, as well as information on its plans and processes. The annual report will continue to summarize NSIRA’s review findings and recommendations in context, situating these elements within a broader discussion of key trends and challenges NSIRA has observed over the year. NSIRA will finish a full update of its review process and procedures, and work with reviewed entities in applying them to all reviews that are starting or in early stages.

In 2022–23, NSIRA will continue to draw on the close relationships it has established with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. The agency will coordinate its activities to ensure review is efficient and comprehensive, and avoids unnecessary duplication of effort.

NSIRA is also developing close ties to its international equivalents. It will continue its participation in the Five Eyes Intelligence Oversight and Review Council (FIORC) that brings together review agency representatives from Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. NSIRA will participate in the FIORC annual conference in the fall of 2022. In addition, NSIRA will participate in FIORC working groups, which aim to meet regularly at the working level to discuss topics of common interest, such as the impacts of new technology, the investigation of complaints from the public and access to information in the possession of reviewed departments. NSIRA also intends to renew its efforts to foster new collaborative relationships with other international review bodies.

Complaints investigations

In 2022–23, NSIRA will also strengthen institutions’ accountability and enhance public confidence by ensuring consistency, quality and timeliness in investigating national security–related complaints. The independent investigation of complaints plays a critical role in maintaining public confidence in Canada’s national security institutions. In 2022–23, NSIRA will continue to offer an informal resolution process to complement the investigative process to respond to complaints. NSIRA will apply its new rules of procedure to promote accessibility, timeliness and efficiency in the investigation of complaints. Finally, NSIRA will establish new service standards for the investigation of complaints.

Gender-based analysis plus

In 2022–23, NSIRA’s Diversity, Inclusion and Employment Equity Advisory Committee will examine and provide advice on its internal policies, programs and procedures, as well as its external service delivery model through the lens of inclusion, diversity and equity.

From a program delivery perspective, NSIRA is working closely with its partner, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP, to develop strategies for the collection, analysis and use of race-based and demographic data in the context of the complaints process. The objectives of this initiative are to improve access to justice by improving awareness and understanding of the investigation process. The intent is also to document the different racial groups among civilian complainants and determine:

  • whether there are significant racial disparities;
  • whether there are racial differences with respect to the types of complaints made against national security agency members based on different groups;
  • the frequency of complaints that include allegations of racial or other forms of bias;
  • whether complaint investigation outcomes vary by racial group; and
  • whether civilian satisfaction with NSIRA’s investigation process also varies by racial group.

NSIRA’s program of planned and ongoing reviews also takes into account the potential for national security and intelligence activities to result in disparate outcomes for minority groups. Ongoing reviews of the Canada Border Services Agency’s targeting practices, as well as the use of biometrics in a national security and intelligence context, include specific considerations of the impacts of these activities on diverse communities.

From a corporate perspective, the Diversity, Inclusion and Employment Equity Advisory Committee will also continue to engage with NSIRA’s personnel on issues related to systemic discrimination and racism through seminars and learning events. The intent is to continue to create an environment in which all employees feel comfortable and will not shy away from participating in discussions on issues related to anti-racism, diversity and inclusion.

As well, NSIRA is developing a self-identification process for its employees that will allow it to shape its staffing and employment equity strategies to increase representation and to ensure it reflects the diversity of the Canadian public, which it serves.

Experimentation

Given the functions and responsibilities of NSIRA, the organization does not engage in experimentation activities.

Key risks

NSIRA’s ability to access the information it needs to do its work and speak to the relevant stakeholders to understand policies, operations and ongoing issues is closely tied to the capacity of the organizations being reviewed to respond to NSIRA’s demands. The resource constraints of those organizations might continue to be compounded next year by disruptions stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. This presents a risk of hindering NSIRA’s ability to deliver on its mandate in a timely way. NSIRA is mitigating this risk by ensuring clear communication about information requests and by setting review priorities.

The physical distancing precautions established by the COVID-19 pandemic will likely continue to be needed in 2022–23. While NSIRA invested in technology and adapted and expanded its office space to accommodate these requirements, the pandemic may still affect NSIRA’s ability to deliver on its mandate in a timely way and limit the frequency and type of outreach NSIRA can accomplish. The agency will continue to innovate and adapt to conduct its operations and, as necessary, engage virtually with stakeholders, departments and agencies.

Planned results for National Security and Intelligence Activity Reviews and Complaints Investigations

The following table shows, for National Security and Intelligence Activity Reviews and Complaints Investigations, the planned results, the result indicators, the targets and the target dates for 2022–23, and the actual results for the three most recent fiscal years for which actual results are available.

Departmental results Departmental result indicator Target Date to achieve target 2018–19 actual result 2019–20 actual result 2020–21 actual result
Note: Because NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, there is no comparative information to provide for 2018–19. Actual results for 2019–20 are not available as the new Departmental Results Framework in the changeover from the Security Intelligence Review Committee to NSIRA was being developed. This new framework is for measuring and reporting on results achieved starting in 2021–22, thus no actual results can be reported for 2020–21 either.
Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary All mandatory reviews are completed on an annual basis 100% completion of mandatory reviews December 2022 Not applicable (N/A) N/A N/A
Reviews of national security or intelligence activities of at least five departments or agencies are conducted each year At least one national security or intelligence activity is reviewed in at least five departments or agencies annually December 2022 N/A N/A N/A
All Member-approved high priority national security or intelligence activities are reviewed over a three- year period 100% completion over three years; at least 33% completed each year December 2022 N/A N/A N/A
National security-related complaints are independently investigated in a timely manner Percentage of investigations completed within NSIRA service standards 90% March 2023 N/A N/A N/A

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned budgetary financial resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2022–23 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2022–23 planned spending 2023–24 planned spending 2024–25 planned spending
10,756,818 10,756,818 10,757,687 10,757,687

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned human resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2022–23 planned full-time equivalents 2023–24 planned full-time equivalents 2024–25 planned full-time equivalents
69.0 69.0 69.0

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Internal Services: planned results

Description

Internal services are the services that are provided within a department so that it can meet its corporate obligations and deliver its programs. There are 10 categories of internal services:

  • Management and Oversight Services
  • Communications Services
  • Legal Services
  • Human Resources Management Services
  • Financial Management Services
  • Information Management Services
  • Information Technology Services
  • Real Property Management Services
  • Materiel Management Services
  • Acquisition Management Services

Planning highlights

As it enters a third full year of operation, NSIRA will continue to take steps to ensure resources are deployed in the most effective and efficient manner possible and that its operational and administrative structures, tools and processes will continue to focus on supporting the delivery of its priorities.

NSIRA’s employees are the backbone of its operations. Because their health and well-being are key to the agency’s success, several initiatives geared toward improving workplace health and employee well-being will be an ongoing priority.

In an effort to attract and retain talent, NSIRA will further initiatives aimed at articulating NSIRA’s vision, values, culture and brand. The agency will work with employees to establish a hybrid workplace framework and talent/career management programs.

NSIRA has identified and publicly shared an action plan aimed at supporting the federal public service objectives for employment equity, diversity and inclusion. In 2022–23, the agency will accelerate its efforts on this front.

If not further delayed by the pandemic, NSIRA aims to complete its accommodation, infrastructure and systems investments in 2022–23 and initiate self-assessments of its compliance with central agencies’ policies and directives.

Planned budgetary financial resources for Internal Services

2022–23 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2022–23 planned spending 2023–24 planned spending 2024–25 planned spending
17,493,858 17,493,858 7,701,336 7,701,042

Planned human resources for Internal Services

2022–23 planned full-time equivalents 2023–24 planned full-time equivalents 2024–25 planned full-time equivalents
31.0 31.0 31.0

Planned spending and human resources

This section provides an overview of the department’s planned spending and human resources for the next three fiscal years and compares planned spending for 2022–23 with actual spending for the current year and the previous year.

Planned spending

Departmental spending 2019–20 to 2024–24

The following graph presents planned (voted and statutory) spending over time.

Departmental spending trend graph
  2019–20 2020–21 2021–22 2022–23 2023–24 2024–25
Statutory 371,057 962,186 1,295,290 1,727,668 1,727,668 1,727,668
Voted 5,254,250 11,289,189 19,137,337 26,523,008 16,731,355 16,731,061
Total 5,625,250 12,251,375 20,432,627 28,250,676 18,435,987 18,458,729

Fiscal years 2019–20 and 2020–21 show actual expenditures as reported in the Public Accounts, while 2021–2022 presents the forecast for the current fiscal year. Fiscal years 2022–23 to 2024–25 present planned spending.

The 2020–21 spending of $12.2 million increased by $6.6 million (118%), compared to 2019–20. The increase is due to the fact that NSIRA was created in July 2019, which resulted in the actual expenditures for fiscal year 2019–20 reflecting only a partial year of spending. Forecast spending in 2021–22 is higher than 2020–21 spending by $8.2 million (67%), primarily due to growth in personnel and limited investments in accommodation, infrastructure and systems.

Spending is expected to increase by $7.8 million (38%) in 2022–23 compared to 2021–22. This planned increase is mainly due to a re-profile of funding to align to the conduct of projects delayed by the pandemic. Spending is expected to decrease by $9.8 million (35%) in 2023–24, mainly due to the expected completion of the office expansion project in 2022–23. Spending is expected to remain relatively unchanged in 2024–25 from 2023–4.

Budgetary planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services (dollars)

The following table shows information on spending for each of NSIRA’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for 2022–23 and other relevant fiscal years.

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2019–20 actual expenditures 2020–21 actual expenditures 2021–22 forecast spending 2022–23 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2022–23 planned spending 2023–24 planned spending 2024–25 planned spending
National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations 3,009,066 5,607,796 8,074,229 10,756,818 10,756,818 10,757,687 10,757,687
Subtotal 3,009,066 5,607,796 8,074,229 10,756,818 10,756,818 10,757,687 10,757,687
Internal Services 2,616,241 6,643,579 12,358,398 17,493,858 17,493,858 7,701,336 7,701,042
Total 5,625,307 12,251,375 20,432,627 28,250,676 28,250,676 18,459,023 18,458,729

As NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, the numbers for 2019–20 are for the reporting period of July 12, 2019, to March 31, 2020.

Planned human resources

The following table shows information on human resources, in full-time equivalents, for each of NSIRA’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for 2022–23 and the other relevant years.

Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2019–20 Actual full-time equivalents 2020–21 Actual full-time equivalents 2021–22 Forecast full-time equivalents 2022–23 Planned full-time equivalents 2023–24 Planned full-time equivalents 2024–25 Planned full-time equivalents
National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations 17.5 37.8 53.3 69.0 69.0 69.0
Subtotal 17.5 37.8 53.3 69.0 69.0 69.0
Internal Services 11.2 21.7 25.9 31.0 31.0 31.0
Total 28.7 59.5 79.2 100.0 100.0 100.0

Over the course of 2019–20, funding for an additional 26 FTEs was received to account for NSIRA’s expanded mandate. It is expected that NSIRA will be at full capacity by the close of 2021–22 to fulfil its new mandate.

Estimates by vote

Information on NSIRA’s organizational appropriations is available in the 2022–23 Main Estimates.

Condensed future-oriented statement of operations

The future-oriented condensed statement of operations provides an overview of NSIRA’s operations for 2021–22 to 2022–23.

The forecast and planned amounts in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The forecast and planned amounts presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.

A more detailed future-oriented statement of operations and associated notes, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations with the requested authorities, are available on NSIRA’s website.

Future-oriented Condensed statement of operations for the year ending March 31, 2022 (dollars)

Financial information 2021–22 Forecast results 2022–23 Planned results Difference (2022–23 planned results minus 2021–22 Forecast results)
Total expenses 21,850,048 28,625,397 6,775,349
Total revenues
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 21,850,048 28,625,397 6,775,349

The difference between the 2022–23 planned results and 2021–22 forecast results is mostly explained by planned accommodation, infrastructure and systems project costs.

Corporate Information

Organizational profile

Appropriate minister: The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Institutional head: John Davies, Executive Director
Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office
Enabling instrument: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act
Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do

“Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do” is available on NSIRA‘s website.

Operating context

Information on the operating context is available on NSIRA’s website.

Reporting framework

NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is under development. Additional information on key performance measures will be included in the 2021- 22 Departmental Plan.

Graph: Reporting Framework - Text version follows
Core Responsibility: National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations
Departmental Results Framework Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary Indicator: All mandatory reviews are completed on an annual basis Internal Services
Indicator: Reviews of national security or intelligence activities of at least five departments or agencies are conducted each year
Indicator: All Member-approved high priority national security or intelligence activities are reviewed over a three-year period
National security-related complaints are independently investigated in a timely manner Indicator: Percentage of investigations completed within NSIRA service standards
Program Inventory Program: National security and intelligence activity reviews and complaints investigations

The changeover of the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) to NSIRA required significant changes to the Departmental Results Framework, expected results and indicators. With NSIRA’s broader mandate, these changes now provide a framework for measuring and reporting on results achieved starting in 2021–22 and beyond.

Changes to the approved reporting framework since 2020-21

Structure 2020-21 2021-22 Change Reason for change
Total expenses Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s (CSIS’s) operational activities National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations New Core responsibility New Departmental Results Framework
Programs Review of CSIS’s operations National security and intelligence activity reviews and complaints investigations New Program New Departmental Results Framework
Investigation of complaints against CSIS

Supporting information on the program inventory

Supporting information on planned expenditures, human resources, and results related to NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on NSIRA‘s website.

  • Gender-based analysis plus

Federal tax expenditures

NSIRA’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures.

Tax expenditures are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for government­‑wide tax expenditures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures. This report provides detailed information on tax expenditures, including objectives, historical background and references to related federal spending programs, as well as evaluations, research papers and gender-based analysis plus.

Organizational contact information

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
P.O. Box 2430, Station “D” Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5W5

Telephone: The phone number is temporarily disabled
Fax: The fax number is temporarily disabled.
Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
Website: www.nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Appendix: definitions

appropriation (crédit)

Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)

Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.

core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)

An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.

Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)

A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3‑year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring.

departmental priority (priorité)

A plan or project that a department has chosen to focus and report on during the planning period. Priorities represent the things that are most important or what must be done first to support the achievement of the desired departmental results.

departmental result (résultat ministériel)

A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.

departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)

A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.

departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)

A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.

Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)

A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.

experimentation (expérimentation)

The conducting of activities that seek to first explore, then test and compare the effects and impacts of policies and interventions in order to inform evidence-based decision-making, and improve outcomes for Canadians, by learning what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Experimentation is related to, but distinct from innovation (the trying of new things), because it involves a rigorous comparison of results. For example, using a new website to communicate with Canadians can be an innovation; systematically testing the new website against existing outreach tools or an old website to see which one leads to more engagement, is experimentation.

full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)

A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full‑time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.

gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])

An analytical process used to assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people experience policies, programs and services based on multiple factors including race ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.

government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)

For the purpose of the 2020–21 Departmental Results Report, those high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2019 Speech from the Throne, namely: Fighting climate change; Strengthening the Middle Class; Walking the road of reconciliation; Keeping Canadians safe and healthy; and Positioning Canada for success in an uncertain world.

horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)

An initiative where two or more federal organizations are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.

non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)

Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.

performance (rendement)

What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.

performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)

A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.

performance reporting (production de rapports sur le rendement)

The process of communicating evidence‑based performance information. Performance reporting supports decision making, accountability and transparency.

plan (plan)

The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result.

planned spending (dépenses prévues)

For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates.

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)

Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.

program inventory (répertoire des programmes)

Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.

result (résultat)

A consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the organization’s influence.

statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)

Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.

target (cible)

A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.

voted expenditures (dépenses votées)

Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Departmental Results Report: 2020-21

Meta data information

Cat. Number: PS106-8E-PDF
ISSN: 2563-5174

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2021

Date of Publishing:

From the Executive Director

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) continued to experience significant growth and transformation in the 2020–21 fiscal year, its first full year of operation. Our focus has been to ensure that NSIRA transitioned effectively to a much larger organization with a broader mandate. To do so, we hired talented new staff across all business lines to support our expanded mandate. We also secured new temporary accommodations at a secondary site to support increased staff numbers.

In 2020–21, we re-evaluated the way we implement our mandate and developed innovative practices to fulfil our core responsibilities. Our organization completed a major reform effort aimed at enhancing the timeliness and accessibility of complaints investigations. This was the result of extensive stakeholder consultations and will set the direction for our work in this area for years to come. In addition, we worked to refine our review process and methodology, with a view to promoting greater consistency across reviews. Our work has also been aided by growing networks and partnerships with Canadian and international academics and civil society organizations, as well as other review bodies.

In implementing our review function, we took advantage of our broader mandate to review a wide variety of departments and agencies that make up Canada’s national security and intelligence apparatus, including several cross-departmental reviews. We also overcame the challenges of leading investigations during the pandemic and completed and closed several cases.

We are committed to keeping the public informed about the results of our reviews, investigations and activities while still protecting sensitive information. We consider this to be a major part of building accountability among departments and agencies involved in national security or intelligence activities. To that effect, we have worked with departments and agencies to release unclassified versions of our reports. Additionally, we committed in a new policy statement to declassify and depersonalize all complaints investigation reports going forward. It is our hope that these initiatives will foster open discussion and debate, and help to advance the dialogue on national security and intelligence issues in Canada.

I would like to thank NSIRA staff for their dedication and hard work over the past year, and for their commitment to continuing to build our organization.

John Davies
Executive Director
National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

Results at a glance

NSIRA began operating in 2019 as a new independent accountability mechanism in Canada. Its broad review and investigations mandate covers the national security and intelligence activities of departments and agencies across the federal government. The agency’s total actual spending in 2020–21 amounted to $12,251,375 and its total actual full-time equivalents were 60.

The pandemic required NSIRA staff to work remotely, limiting its access to classified materials that are critical to NSIRA’s work. To adjust, NSIRA revised its review plans, and implemented strict rotating schedules to enable limited office access for classified work to continue safely. This allowed NSIRA to fulfil its statutory obligations and uphold its commitments to Canadians. Despite the restrictions, NSIRA was able to enhance its scrutiny of Canada’s national security and intelligence activities.

Below are some of NSIRA’s achievements in 2020–21.

Review

NSIRA’s review of national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions ensures that ministers and Canadians are informed about whether these activities were lawful, reasonable and necessary.

During fiscal year 2020–21, NSIRA completed and approved nine reviews, including seven dedicated to reviewing the activities of a specific department or agency and two interdepartmental reviews that involved more than a dozen departments and agencies. This helped to advance both the breadth and depth of NSIRA’s knowledge and experience.

NSIRA also developed and elaborated a review framework that embeds legal and technological experts in the review process from the outset of reviews, and outlines a clear process to promote consistency across subject areas.

Complaint investigations

NSIRA investigates national security–related complaints from members of the public independently and strives to do so in a timely manner.

In fiscal year 2020–21, NSIRA completed two investigations and issued two final reports. It also issued formal decisions to close two other files.

NSIRA also undertook a major reform and modernization of its complaints investigations process. Two priorities guided this undertaking, namely, promoting access to justice for self-represented complainants, and putting in place more streamlined and less formal procedural steps.

Reporting and transparency

NSIRA informs ministers and Canadians of the results of its work through the issuance of reports. In addition to annual reporting mandated by law, NSIRA began releasing redacted versions of its reviews online, starting with a Communications Security Establishment review. NSIRA also published dozens of redacted historical reviews from its predecessor, the Security Intelligence Review Committee.

In addition, NSIRA issued a policy statement in 2020–21 that commits to publishing redacted and depersonalized investigation reports to promote and enhance transparency in its investigations.

For more information on NSIRA’s plans, priorities and results achieved, see the “Results: what we achieved” section of this report.

Results: what we achieved

Core responsibility

Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

Description:

The Secretariat will assist NSIRA members in fulfilling the agency’s mandate. The Secretariat will conduct a range of activities to support the agency, including accessing relevant information and providing strategic and expert advice in the conduct of reviews, quasi-judicial investigation of complaints and the development of reports. It will also provide administrative support in arranging for briefings, hearings and consultations with stakeholders and international counterparts, and support to ensure compliance with security requirements.

Results:

NSIRA will be implementing its new Departmental Results Framework starting in 2021–22.

NSIRA accomplished a great deal in its first full year of operation, having achieved milestones in the review of national security and intelligence activities, as well as in the investigation of national security–related complaints.

Review of national security and intelligence activities

NSIRA completed nine reviews over the course of 2020–21. Seven of these reviews focused primarily on an individual department or agency, while two reviews were interdepartmental by design. Organizations whose activities were the subject of specific reviews included:

  • Canadian Security Intelligence Service — two reviews
  • Communications Security Establishment — three reviews
  • Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces — one review
  • Global Affairs Canada — one review

The two reviews that were interdepartmental by design were the annual review of disclosures under the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act and the annual review of the implementation of directions issued under the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act.

Eight of NSIRA’s reviews resulted in recommendations to ministers on issues related to compliance and governance. One review did not result in any recommendations, but rather established criteria to be used in future assessments. As a result of NSIRA’s unclassified and publicly released reviews, as well as its annual reporting, NSIRA contributes to increased confidence among Canadians in the independent review of national security and intelligence activities carried out by Government of Canada institutions.

During the reporting period, NSIRA developed a review framework to promote high quality and rigour in its work, and to ensure consistency in the way it executes reviews. This framework provides systematic guidance on NSIRA’s process and approach, and embeds legal and technological expertise in reviews from the outset. In the year ahead, NSIRA will continue to refine and improve its review process to produce the most consistent, objective and rigorous reviews possible.

This past year, NSIRA also focused on enhancing staff expertise in the national security operational environment, including the relevant legal and policy instruments, and building knowledge through iterative learning. To this end, NSIRA is developing a structured training program for NSIRA’s review analysts, with a focus on sound and objective methodological principles, and establishing expert networks.

Investigation of national security–related complaints

The pandemic had an adverse impact on the timely conduct of NSIRA’s investigations. Both NSIRA and other federal government parties to investigations were affected by limited access to classified documents. Consequently, in several ongoing matters, NSIRA granted adjournments and extensions of deadlines for procedural steps, including the filing of submissions and evidentiary material. In the challenging circumstances of the pandemic, NSIRA adapted as best as possible and advanced investigative procedures in an innovative manner whenever possible, such as conducting some proceedings in writing and holding case management conferences and meetings virtually.

In fiscal year 2020–21, NSIRA completed two investigations and issued two final reports. It also issued formal decisions to close two other files. Ministers, complainants and the public were informed about the conclusions of investigations of national security–related complaints.

During the year, NSIRA undertook a major reform and modernization of its complaints investigations process. Two priorities guided this process of modernization, namely, promoting access to justice for self-represented complainants, and putting in place more streamlined and less formal procedural steps. As part of this reform, NSIRA created new Rules of Procedure, developed after extensive consultation with stakeholders in the public and private sectors to ensure the most effective and considered final product.

Finally, NSIRA issued a policy statement in 2020–21 that commits to publishing redacted and depersonalized investigation reports to promote and enhance transparency in its investigations.

Gender-based analysis plus

This year NSIRA named a Champion for Employment Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. The Champion worked to create a culture of inclusion by holding staff discussions on anti-racism and themes related to diversity.

In complaints investigations, NSIRA followed a well-documented process in all cases to ensure equal access to justice for all complainants. It began efforts to study how to systematically analyze complaints data from previous years to look at demographic trends, including race. In this regard, it is working jointly with another review body to leverage relevant academic expertise to assist NSIRA in collecting the right kind of data in future complaints investigations to assist with this analysis. The aim is to gain insight into communities most impacted by national security activities, which can assist NSIRA in guiding its outreach and engagement priorities.

NSIRA’s program of planned and ongoing reviews also takes into account the potential for national security and intelligence activities to result in unequal outcomes for visible minority groups. Ongoing reviews of the Canada Border Services Agency’s targeting practices, as well as the use of biometrics in the national security and intelligence context, focus specifically on understanding the impacts of these activities on diverse communities.

NSIRA continued to hire a diverse group of employees with a mix of experience and skills to fulfil its unique mandate. NSIRA conducted blind resume screening and testing as part of its hiring practices. NSIRA has only six executive positions, two of which are classified in the Law Manager (LC) group. Since April 1, 2020, five positions were staffed, of which 60% of the appointees self-identified as a member of an employment equity designated group. As well, four management positions (e.g., EC-07, FI-04, etc.) were staffed in 2020–21, all with members of an employment equity designated group.

Budgetary financial resources (dollars)
2020-21 Main Estimates 2020-21 Planned spending 2020-21 Total authorities available for use 2020-21 Actual spending (authorities used) 2020-21 Difference (Actual spending minus Planned spending)
11,309,411 11,309,411 10,904,766 5,607,796 (5,701,615)

The difference between planned and actual spending for fiscal year 2020–21 is mostly attributable to the pandemic. Delays in staffing resulted in reduced salary, benefits and other employee support costs such as training. The lower than planned spending is also explained by lower than initially planned professional services activities, travel, translation and other direct support.

Human resources (full-time equivalents)
2020–21 Planned full-time equivalents 2020–21 Actual full-time equivalents 2020–21 Difference (Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)
48 38 (10)

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s Program Inventory is available in GC InfoBase.

Internal Services

Description

Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal Services refers to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct service categories that support Program delivery in the organization, regardless of the Internal Services delivery model in a department. The 10 service categories are:

  • Acquisition Management Services
  • Communication Services
  • Financial Management Services
  • Human Resources Management Services
  • Information Management Services
  • Information Technology Services
  • Legal Services
  • Material Management Services
  • Management and Oversight Services
  • Real Property Management Services

Results

In an effort to protect the health and safety of its employees, NSIRA redirected a significant level of resources to the implementation of office safety measures and to the introduction of remote work capabilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In its first full year of operations, NSIRA completed the staffing of all its key Internal Services functions, implemented key financial and human resources systems, initiated the repatriation of functions previously performed by other departments, and introduced several policies and practices to enable it to conduct its work.

For example, NSIRA took steps to develop and implement human resources management policies, terms and conditions of employment, and directives and practices aimed at onboarding and developing new talent. NSIRA also took concrete steps to ensure employee well-being in these trying times.

NSIRA launched several initiatives to strengthen its physical and personnel security measures, improve its information management practices, and introduce new technologies aimed at supporting both remote work capabilities and work from the office through secure video teleconferencing.

Finally, NSIRA worked with Public Services and Procurement Canada to identify and initiate the implementation of office space fit-up and expansion projects to accommodate the growth in its personnel. On that front, significant progress was realized with the identification, design and initiation of several construction projects.

While much remains to be done after its first full year of operation, NSIRA is confident it has established a solid Internal Services foundation for helping its employees succeed and thrive.

Budgetary financial resources (dollars)
2020-21 Main Estimates 2020-21 Planned spending 2020-21 Total authorities available for use 2020-21 Actual spending (authorities used) 2020-21 Difference (Actual spending minus Planned spending)
12,975,559 12,975,559 12,649,138 6,643,579 (6,331,980)

The difference of $6.3 million between planned and actual spending is mainly explained by the impacts of the pandemic on NSIRA’s ability to progress with its facilities fit-up and expansion plans, as well as on its planned spending on Internal Services infrastructure and systems.

Human resources (full-time equivalents)
2020–21 Planned full-time equivalents 2020–21 Actual full-time equivalents 2020–21 Difference (Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)
22 22 0

Actual expenditures

Departmental spending trend graph

The following graph presents planned (voted and statutory spending) over time.

Graph: Departmental spending trend - Text version follows
Departmental spending trend graph
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
Statutory 0 371,057 962,186 1,704,632 1,704,632 1,704,632
Voted 0 5,254,250 11,289,189 28,490,287 24,423,008 16,731,355
Total 0 5,625,250 12,251,375 30,194,919 26,127,640 18,435,987

Note: NSIRA did not exist in 2018–19. The 2019–20 figures combine the spending for NSIRA and the Security Intelligence Review Committee, since NSIRA took over that organization’s staffing and funding in July of that fiscal year.

The graph illustrates NSIRA’s spending trends over a six-year period from 2018–19 to 2023–24. Fiscal years 2018–19 to 2020–21 reflect actual expenditures as reported in the Public Accounts. Fiscal years 2021–22 to 2023–24 represent planned spending.

The increase in spending from 2019–20 to 2020–21 is mainly explained by the cost of additional resources hired by NSIRA over that period, by an increase in professional services costs, and by the start of facilities fit-up and expansion.

The overall difference between actual spending in 2020–21 and planned spending in 2021–22 is due to lower spending than planned on payroll and on facilities fit-up and expansion in 2020–21 as a result of the pandemic. It is also due to a one-time reprofile of spending authorities into 2021–22 and 2022–23 to account for accommodation fit-up and expansion delays.

The difference between the peaks in spending authorities in 2021–22 and 2022–23 with the leveling of authorities in 2023–24 is due to the anticipated completion of facilities fit-up and expansion in the first two fiscal years.

Budgetary performance summary for Core Responsibilities and Internal Services (dollars)
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2020-21 Main Estimates 2020-21 Planned spending 2021-22 Planned spending 2022-23 Planned spending 2020-21 Total authorities available for use 2018-19 Actual spending (authorities used) 2019-20 Actual spending (authorities used) 2020-21 Actual spending (authorities used)
Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency 11,309,411 11,309,411 12,047,835 10,740,923 10,904,766 3,009,066 5,607,796
Subtotal 11,309,411 11,309,411 12,047,835 10,740,923 10,904,766 3,009,066 5,607,796
Internal Services 12,975,559 12,975,559 18,147,084 15,386,717 12,649,138 2,616,241 6,643,579
Total 24,284,970 24,284,970 30,194,919 26,127,640 23,553,904 5,625,307 12,251,375

Actual human resources

Human resources summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2018-19 Actual full-time equivalents 2019-20 Actual full-time equivalents 2020-21 Planned full-time equivalents 2020-21 Actual full-time equivalents 2021-22 Planned full-time equivalents 2022-23 Planned full-time equivalents
Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency 0 18 48 38 69 69
Internal Services 0 11 22 22 31 31
Total 0 29 70 60 100 100

Over the course of 2020–21, the overall count for full-time equivalents went from 29 to 60. NSIRA is working to have a full complement of human resources by the end of fiscal year 2021–22.

Expenditures by vote

For information on NSIRA’s organizational voted and statutory expenditures, consult the Public Accounts of Canada 2020–2021.

Government of Canada spending and activities

Information on the alignment of NSIRA’s spending with the Government of Canada’s spending and activities is available in GC InfoBase.

Financial statements and financial statements highlights

Financial statements

SIRC’s and NSIRA’s financial statements (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2019, are available on NSIRA‘s website.

Financial statement highlights

Condensed Statement of Operations (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2020 (dollars)
Financial information 2020-21 Planned results 2020-21 Actual results 2019-20 Actual results Difference (2020-21 Actual results minus 2020-21 Planned results) Difference (2020-21 Actual results minus 2019-20 Actual results)
Total expenses 25,780,059 11,662,601 6,330,487 (14,117,458) 5,332,114
Total revenues 248 0 0 (248) 0
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 25,779,881 11,662,601 6,330,487 (14,117,458) 5,332,114

Difference between 2019–20 actual results and 2020–21 actual results:

The agency’s actual net cost of operations before government funding and transfer for 2020–21, as compared with 2019–20, increased by $5,332,114 due to fact that the 2019–20 comparable figures presented in the Statement of Operations related to a partial year of operations.

Difference between 2020–21 actual results and 2020–21 planned results:

The agency’s actual net cost of operations from continuing activities was $14,117,210 lower than the planned results for the fiscal year as a result of the significant impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the ability of NSIRA to grow the organization as planned.

État condensé de la situation financière (non audité) au 31 mars 2021 (en dollars)
Financial information 2020-21 2019-20 Difference (2020-21 minus 2019-20)
Total net liabilities 2,050,302 2,029,928 20,374
Total net financial assets 1,577,964 1,627,351 (49,387)
Departmental net debt 472,338 402,577 69,761
Total non-financial assets 2,240,138 1,075,318 1,164,820
Departmental net financial position 1,767,800 672,741 1,095,059

In 2020–21, the department’s net liabilities increased by $20,374. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in employee future benefits.

Total net financial and non-financial assets were $3,818,102, an increase of $1,115,433 from 2019–20. This increase is attributable to an increase in tangible capital assets and accounts receivable from other governmental departments.

Corporate Information

Organizational profile

Appropriate minister: The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Institutional head: John Davies, Executive Director
Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office
Enabling instrument: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act
Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do

“Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do” is available on NSIRA‘s website.

Operating context

Information on the operating context is available on NSIRA’s website.

Reporting framework

NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, were under development in 2020–21. Additional information on key performance measures are included in the 2021–22 Departmental Plan.

Supporting information on the program inventory

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s Program Inventory is available in GC InfoBase.

Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on NSIRA‘s website.

  • Gender-based analysis plus

Federal tax expenditures

The tax system can be used to achieve public policy objectives through the application of special measures such as low tax rates, exemptions, deductions, deferrals and credits. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for these measures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures. This report also provides detailed background information on tax expenditures, including descriptions, objectives, historical information and references to related federal spending programs. The tax measures presented in this report are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance.

Organizational contact information

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
P.O. Box 2430, Station “D”
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5W5

The phone number is temporarily disabled
Fax: 613-907-4445

Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
Website: www.nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Appendix: definitions

appropriation (crédit)

Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)

Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.

core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)

An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.

Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)

A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3‑year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring.

departmental priority (priorité)

A plan or project that a department has chosen to focus and report on during the planning period. Priorities represent the things that are most important or what must be done first to support the achievement of the desired departmental results.

departmental result (résultat ministériel)

A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.

departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)

A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.

departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)

A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.

Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)

A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.

experimentation (expérimentation)

The conducting of activities that seek to first explore, then test and compare the effects and impacts of policies and interventions in order to inform evidence-based decision-making, and improve outcomes for Canadians, by learning what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Experimentation is related to, but distinct from innovation (the trying of new things), because it involves a rigorous comparison of results. For example, using a new website to communicate with Canadians can be an innovation; systematically testing the new website against existing outreach tools or an old website to see which one leads to more engagement, is experimentation.

full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)

A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full‑time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.

gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])

An analytical process used to assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people experience policies, programs and services based on multiple factors including race ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.

government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)

For the purpose of the 2020–21 Departmental Results Report, those high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2019 Speech from the Throne, namely: Fighting climate change; Strengthening the Middle Class; Walking the road of reconciliation; Keeping Canadians safe and healthy; and Positioning Canada for success in an uncertain world.

horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)

An initiative where two or more federal organizations are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.

non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)

Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.

performance (rendement)

What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.

performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)

A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.

performance reporting (production de rapports sur le rendement)

The process of communicating evidence‑based performance information. Performance reporting supports decision making, accountability and transparency.

plan (plan)

The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result.

planned spending (dépenses prévues)

For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates.

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)

Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.

program inventory (répertoire des programmes)

Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.

result (résultat)

A consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the organization’s influence.

statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)

Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.

target (cible)

A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.

voted expenditures (dépenses votées)

Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Gender-Based Analysis Plus: 2020-21

Date of Publishing:

Section 1: Institutional GBA+ Capacity

This year NSIRA named a Champion for Employment Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. The Champion worked to create a culture of inclusion by holding staff discussions on anti-racism and themes related to diversity.

In complaints investigations, NSIRA followed a well-documented process in all cases to ensure equal access to justice for all complainants. It began efforts to study how to systematically analyze complaints data from previous years to look at demographic trends, including race. In this regard, it is working jointly with another review body to leverage relevant academic expertise to assist NSIRA in collecting the right kind of data in future complaints investigations to assist with this analysis. The aim is to gain insight into communities most impacted by national security activities, which can assist NSIRA in guiding its outreach and engagement priorities.

NSIRA’s program of planned and ongoing reviews also takes into account the potential for national security and intelligence activities to result in unequal outcomes for visible minority groups. Ongoing reviews of the Canada Border Services Agency’s targeting practices, as well as the use of biometrics in the national security and intelligence context, focus specifically on understanding the impacts of these activities on diverse communities.

NSIRA continued to hire a diverse group of employees with a mix of experience and skills to fulfil its unique mandate. NSIRA conducted blind resume screening and testing as part of its hiring practices. NSIRA has only six executive positions, two of which are classified in the Law Manager (LC) group. Since April 1, 2020, five positions were staffed, of which 60% of the appointees self-identified as a member of an employment equity designated group. As well, four management positions (e.g., EC-07, FI-04, etc.) were staffed in 2020–21, all with members of an employment equity designated group.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Departmental Plan: 2021-2022

Meta data information

Cat. Number: PS106-6E-PDF
ISSN: 2563-0334

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020

Date of Publishing:

From the Executive Director

I am very pleased to present the 2021–22 Departmental Plan for the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA). The year ahead will build on a very successful 2020–21, in which we achieved several key milestones for our new agency, despite the challenges imposed on us and the organizations we review as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2021–22, we will be continuing to implement NSIRA’s three-year review plan, which emphasizes reviews of increasing scale and complexity as we become familiar with the operations of departments and agencies that have only recently become subject to review.

In the year ahead, we will also roll out a new process for taking in and investigating complaints from members of the public. Multiple key stakeholders will help to shape this new process, which aims to provide greater accessibility and greater timeliness to our complaints investigation function.

Significant efforts to scale up our operations will continue in 2021–22, including expanding to a second site, recruiting staff across all business lines, and continuing our support to staff working from home. In all aspects, we will continue to prioritize our staff’s health and safety as we build on our successes and pursue ambitious organizational goals. We will also continue to emphasize diversity and inclusion in the workplace, including developing an employment equity strategy.

More details on this and other initiatives are found in this report. I hope that it helps inform Canadians of NSIRA’s priorities for the year ahead.

John Davies
Executive Director

Plans at a glance

Over the coming year, NSIRA will continue its ambitious review agenda, based on the three-year review plan established in 2020–21. This will include mandatory reviews related to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act and Governor in Council directions under the Avoiding Complicity in Mistreatment by Foreign Entities Act. NSIRA will also continue to expand the agency’s knowledge of departments and agencies not previously subject to expert review, including through the conduct of interagency reviews and by “following the thread” of activities from one agency to another. Of note, in 2021–22, NSIRA will continue its comprehensive review, announced in July 2020, to fully identify the systemic, governance and cultural shortcomings and failures that resulted in CSIS engaging in illegal activity and a related breach of candour to the Federal Court.

In 2021–22, NSIRA will also focus on implementing a new model for investigating complaints. This work will be rooted in the development of new rules of procedure, which will be implemented after consultation with key stakeholders in the year ahead. The goals of this process are to enhance access to justice for complainants and to ensure that NSIRA investigates complaints in a timely manner.

An important responsibility over the coming year will be further adapting operations to the conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a priority on maintaining a safe and healthy work environment. NSIRA will also emphasize employment equity, diversity and inclusion as a major corporate theme over the year ahead, including training staff on key concepts.

For more information on NSIRA’s plans, priorities and planned results, see the “Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks” section of this report.

Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks

This section contains detailed information on the department’s planned results and resources for each of its core responsibilities. It also contains information on key risks related to achieving those results.

National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations

Description

NSIRA reviews Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to assess whether they are lawful, reasonable and necessary. It investigates complaints from members of the public regarding activities of CSIS, CSE or the national security activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), as well as certain other national security–related complaints. This independent scrutiny contributes to the strengthening of the framework of accountability for national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions and supports public confidence in this regard.

Planning highlights

In support of this outcome, in 2021–22, NSIRA will implement an ambitious review agenda. It will continue to review the activities of CSIS and CSE to provide responsible ministers and the Canadian public with an informed assessment of these activities, including their lawfulness, reasonableness and necessity. NSIRA will also build on the knowledge it has acquired of departments and agencies, such as the RCMP, the Canada Border Services Agency, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, and the Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces. Using that knowledge, NSIRA will ensure these organizations’ national security or intelligence activities are independently verified and assessed. NSIRA is committed to transcending the silos that have characterized national security review until now, and will “follow the thread” of an activity between agencies to ensure its assessments reflect the complex and interwoven approach Canada takes to national security.

In 2021–22, NSIRA will complete its review of the systemic, governance and cultural factors that led to CSIS engaging in illegal activity and breaching its duty of candour to the Federal Court. This review is being conducted jointly by two NSIRA members, the Honourable Marie Deschamps, a former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, and Craig Forcese, a professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa. This matter was referred to NSIRA by the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the Minister of Justice. NSIRA is confident its findings and recommendations will play a constructive role in ensuring that future national security activities reflect Canadians’ expectations of these fundamental institutions.

NSIRA is committed to ensuring its review agenda remains responsive and topical. In 2021–22, NSIRA will continue to engage with community stakeholders to understand their concerns surrounding national security and intelligence activities. NSIRA will ensure that matters of equity and non-discrimination are reflected in its review agenda. NSIRA’s work must also be accessible to the public and civil society. In 2021–22, NSIRA will increase its activities on Twitter and ensure that the agency’s processes, methodologies and findings are readily available on its website. NSIRA will proactively publish unclassified versions of its reports throughout the year. The annual report will continue to summarize NSIRA’s review findings and recommendations in context, situating these elements within a broader discussion of the key trends and challenges NSIRA has observed over the year.

In 2021–22, NSIRA will continue to draw on the close relationships it has established with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. The agency will coordinate its activities to ensure review is efficient and comprehensive, and avoids unnecessary duplication of effort. NSIRA is also developing close ties to its international equivalents. It will host a conference in 2021–22 that will bring together review agency representatives from Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to discuss artificial intelligence and other topics of common interest. NSIRA will also deploy multidisciplinary review teams in 2021–22, leveraging the integrated expertise of researchers, lawyers and technical experts right from the start. This will ensure NSIRA reviews reflect a sound understanding of many complex issues, and that the agency is equipped to provide clear, precise analysis of the impacts of new technology in an ever-changing national security environment.

In 2021–22, NSIRA will also strengthen institutions’ accountability and enhance public confidence by ensuring consistency, quality and timeliness in investigating national security–related complaints. The independent investigation of complaints plays a critical role in maintaining public confidence in Canada’s national security institutions. In 2021–22, NSIRA will continue to offer an informal resolution process to complement the investigative process to respond to complaints. NSIRA also developed new rules of procedure to ensure timeliness in the investigation of complaints. The ambition is to ensure access to justice. New service standards to be set in January 2021 will enable baseline measurements to be established in 2021–22.

Gender-based analysis plus

In 2021–22, NSIRA will undertake several initiatives related to employment equity, diversity and inclusion. Incorporating baseline data derived from employee self-identification, NSIRA will develop an employment equity strategy to increase representation and to ensure it reflects the diversity of the Canadian public, which it serves.

Training and learning events for staff on issues related to systemic discrimination will continue over the coming year. These activities will ensure a common understanding of key concepts and build a corporate culture that promotes the values of diversity and inclusion in the workplace.

Work will continue in 2021–22 to incorporate analysis of bias and discrimination into reviews and complaints investigations. NSIRA will also work with centres of excellence within the Government of Canada to enhance its understanding of how gender-based analysis plus concepts can be more formally integrated into its work.

Finally, NSIRA will build on outreach and engagement conducted over the past year to expand its range of stakeholder partnerships and learn more about concerns related to the differential impacts of national security and intelligence activities.

Key risks

NSIRA’s ability to access the information it needs to do its work and speak to the relevant stakeholders to understand policies, operations and ongoing issues is closely tied to the capacity of the organizations being reviewed to respond to NSIRA’s demands. The resource constraints of those organizations might continue to be compounded next year by disruptions stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. This presents a risk of hindering NSIRA’s ability to deliver on its mandate in a timely way. NSIRA is mitigating this risk by ensuring clear communication about information requests and by setting review priorities.

The physical distancing precautions required by the COVID-19 pandemic might continue to be needed in 2021–22. This would limit employees’ access to NSIRA offices and to classified physical and electronic documents. Such restrictions could slow NSIRA’s ability to deliver on its mandate in a timely way and limit the frequency and type of outreach NSIRA can do in person. The pandemic also complicates the recruitment, on-boarding and training of new review staff. NSIRA is mitigating these risks by adapting its office space and investing in communications technology. It will continue to innovate to enable its operations and engage virtually with stakeholders, departments and agencies.

Departmental results Departmental result indicator Target Date to achieve target 2017-18 actual results* 2018-19 actual results* 2019-20 actual results*
*Because NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, there is no comparative information to provide for 2017–18 and 2018–19. Actual results for 2019–20 are not available as the new Departmental Results Framework in the changeover from the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) to NSIRA was being developed. This new framework is for measuring and reporting on results achieved starting in 2021–22.
Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary All mandatory reviews are completed on an annual basis 100% completion of mandatory reviews 2021-22 Not applicable (N/A) N/A N/A
Reviews of national security or intelligence activities of at least five departments or agencies are conducted each year At least one national security or intelligence activity is reviewed in at least five departments or agencies annually 2021-22 N/A N/A N/A
All Member-approved high priority national security or intelligence activities are reviewed over a three- year period 100% completion over three years; at least 33% completed each year 2021-22 N/A N/A N/A
National security-related complaints are independently investigated in a timely manner Percentage of investigations completed within NSIRA service standards 90% 2021-22 N/A N/A N/A

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned budgetary financial resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2021–22 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending 2023–24 planned spending
12,047,835 12,047,835 10,740,923 10,744,262

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned human resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2021–22 planned full-time equivalents 2022–23 planned full-time equivalents 2023–24 planned full-time equivalents
69.0 69.0 69.0

It is expected that NSIRA will be at full capacity by the close of 2021–22 to fulfil its new mandate.

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Internal Services: planned results

Description

Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of Programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal Services refers to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct services that support Program delivery in the organization, regardless of the Internal Services delivery model in a department. These services are:

  • Management and Oversight Services
  • Communications Services
  • Legal Services
  • Human Resources Management Services
  • Financial Management Services
  • Information Management Services
  • Information Technology Services
  • Real Property Management Services
  • Materiel Management Services
  • Acquisition Management Services

Planning highlights

A key priority in the coming year will be Internal Services support and leadership with respect to the development and implementation of effective employment equity, diversity and inclusion strategies.

NSIRA will also continue to leverage technologies and proven information management practices to increase the effectiveness of operations as the agency continues to operate under COVID-19 pandemic conditions.

The ability of NSIRA to continue its rapid increase in personnel will be contingent on effective Internal Services functions. As a result, over the coming year, NSIRA will continue to invest in and strengthen its frameworks for human resources management, information technology and security, and continue to implement its accommodation strategy.

Planned budgetary financial resources for Internal Services

2021–22 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending 2023–24 planned spending
18,147,084 18,147,084 15,386,717 7,691,725

Planned human resources for Internal Services

2021–22 planned full-time equivalents 2022–23 planned full-time equivalents 2023–24 planned full-time equivalents
31.0 31.0 31.0

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Spending and human resources

This section provides an overview of the department’s planned spending and human resources for the next three consecutive fiscal years, and compares planned spending for the upcoming year with the current year’s spending.

Planned spending

Departmental spending 2018–19 to 2023–24

The following graph presents planned (voted and statutory) spending over time.

Departmental spending trend graph
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
Statutory 0 371,057 1,056,362 1,704,632 1,704,632 1,704,632
Voted 0 5,254,250 16,662,479 28,490,287 24,423,008 16,731,355
Total 0 5,625,250 17,718,841 30,194,919 26,127,640 18,435,987

Because NSIRA was created in July 2019, the actual expenditures of fiscal year 2019–20 do not reflect a full fiscal year of spending. The increase from 2019–20 to 2020–21 is also explained by growth in personnel and the initiation of accommodation, infrastructure and systems investments that were delayed from the previous fiscal year.

Fiscal years 2021–22 to 2023–24 present planned spending based on approved authorities. The fluctuation in planned spending between fiscal year 2020–21 to 2023–24 is mainly explained by funds earmarked for the completion of accommodation, infrastructure and systems projects.

When compared with the Departmental Plan from the previous year, the change in planned spending for 2021–22 and 2022–23 is largely resulting from a reprofile of funding from 2019–20 to 2021–22 and 2022–23 to align funding with the delayed projects noted.

Planned spending for 2023–24 shows the ongoing financial authorities after completion of the office expansion project.

Budgetary planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services (dollars)

The following table shows actual, forecast and planned spending for NSIRA’s core responsibility and for Internal Services for the years relevant to the current planning year.

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2017–18 expenditures 2018–19 expenditures 2019–20 forecast spending 2020–21 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2020–21 planned spending 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending
* Because NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, there is no comparative information to provide for prior years. Numbers for 2019–20 are for the reporting period of July 12, 2019 – March 31, 2020.
National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations N/A 3,009,066 6,716,166 12,047,835 12,047,835 10,740,923 10,744,262
Subtotal N/A 3,009,066 6,716,166 12,047,835 12,047,835 10,740,923 10,744,262
Internal Services N/A 2,616,241 11,002,675 18,147,084 18,147,084 15,386,717 7,691,725
Total N/A 5,625,307 17,718,841 30,194,919 30,194,919 26,127,640 18,435,987

Planned human resources

The following table shows actual, forecast and planned full-time equivalents (FTEs) for the core responsibility in NSIRA’s departmental results framework and for Internal Services for the years relevant to the current planning year.

Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2018-19 Actual full-time equivalents 2019-20 Actual full-time equivalents 2020-21 Forecast full-time equivalents 2021-22 Planned full-time equivalents 2022-23 Planned full-time equivalents 2023-24 Planned full-time equivalents
* Because NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, there is no comparative information to provide for prior years. Numbers for 2019–20 are for the reporting period of July 12, 2019 – March 31, 2020.
Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency N/A 17.5 44.1 69.0 69.0 69.0
Subtotal N/A 17.5 44.1 69.0 69.0 69.0
Internal Services N/A 11.2 23.6 31.0 31.0 31.0
Total N/A 28.7 67.7 100.0 100.0 100.0

Over the course of 2019–20, funding for an additional 26 FTEs was received to account for NSIRA’s expanded mandate. It is expected that NSIRA will be at full capacity by the close of 2021–22 to fulfil its new mandate.

Estimates by vote

Information on NSIRA’s organizational appropriations is available in the 2021–22 Main Estimates.

Condensed future-oriented statement of operations

The future-oriented condensed statement of operations provides an overview of NSIRA’s operations for 2020–21 to 2021–22.

The amounts for forecast and planned results in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The amounts for forecast and planned spending presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.

A more detailed future-oriented statement of operations and associated notes, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations to the requested authorities, are available on NSIRA’s website.

Future-oriented Condensed statement of operations for the year ending March 31, 2022 (dollars)

Financial information 2020-21 Forecast results 2021-22 Planned results Difference (2021-22 planned results minus 2020-21 Forecast results)
Total expenses 17,695,822 28,235,300 10,539,478
Total revenues
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 17,695,822 28,235,300 10,539,478

The difference between the 2021–22 planned results and 2020–21 forecast results is mostly explained by $8.5M of planned accommodation, infrastructure and systems project costs. It is also explained by the increase in personnel to reach NSIRA’s full capacity of 100 FTE’s by the close of 2021–22.

Corporate Information

Organizational profile

Appropriate minister: The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Institutional head: John Davies, Executive Director
Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office
Enabling instrument: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act
Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do

“Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do” is available on NSIRA‘s website.

Operating context

Information on the operating context is available on NSIRA’s website.

Reporting framework

NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is under development. Additional information on key performance measures will be included in the 2021- 22 Departmental Plan.

Core Responsibility: National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations
Departmental Results Framework Ministers and Canadians are informed whether national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions are lawful, reasonable and necessary Indicator: All mandatory reviews are completed on an annual basis Internal Services
Indicator: Reviews of national security or intelligence activities of at least five departments or agencies are conducted each year
Indicator: All Member-approved high priority national security or intelligence activities are reviewed over a three-year period
National security-related complaints are independently investigated in a timely manner Indicator: Percentage of investigations completed within NSIRA service standards
Program Inventory Program: National security and intelligence activity reviews and complaints investigations

The changeover of the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) to NSIRA required significant changes to the Departmental Results Framework, expected results and indicators. With NSIRA’s broader mandate, these changes now provide a framework for measuring and reporting on results achieved starting in 2021–22 and beyond.

Changes to the approved reporting framework since 2020-21

Structure 2020-21 2021-22 Change Reason for change
Total expenses Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s (CSIS’s) operational activities National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations New Core responsibility New Departmental Results Framework
Programs Review of CSIS’s operations National security and intelligence activity reviews and complaints investigations New Program New Departmental Results Framework
Investigation of complaints against CSIS

Supporting information on the program inventory

Supporting information on planned expenditures, human resources, and results related to NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on NSIRA‘s website.

  • Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy
  • Gender-based analysis plus

Federal tax expenditures

NSIRA’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures that relate to its planned results for 2021–22.

Tax expenditures are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance, and the Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for government-wide tax expenditures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures.[xi] This report provides detailed information on tax expenditures, including objectives, historical background and references to related federal spending programs, as well as evaluations, research papers and gender-based analysis. The tax measures presented in this report are solely the responsibility of the Minister of Finance.

Organizational contact information

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
P.O. Box 2430, Station “D” Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5W5

Telephone: The phone number is temporarily disabled
Fax: 613-907-4445
Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
Website: www.nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Appendix: definitions

appropriation (crédit)

Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)

Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.

core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)

An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.

Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)

A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3‑year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring.

departmental priority (priorité)

A plan or project that a department has chosen to focus and report on during the planning period. Priorities represent the things that are most important or what must be done first to support the achievement of the desired departmental results.

departmental result (résultat ministériel)

A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.

departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)

A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.

departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)

A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.

Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)

A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.

experimentation (expérimentation)

The conducting of activities that seek to first explore, then test and compare the effects and impacts of policies and interventions in order to inform evidence-based decision-making, and improve outcomes for Canadians, by learning what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Experimentation is related to, but distinct from innovation (the trying of new things), because it involves a rigorous comparison of results. For example, using a new website to communicate with Canadians can be an innovation; systematically testing the new website against existing outreach tools or an old website to see which one leads to more engagement, is experimentation.

full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)

A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full‑time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.

gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])

An analytical process used to assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people experience policies, programs and services based on multiple factors including race ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.

government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)

For the purpose of the 2020–21 Departmental Results Report, those high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2019 Speech from the Throne, namely: Fighting climate change; Strengthening the Middle Class; Walking the road of reconciliation; Keeping Canadians safe and healthy; and Positioning Canada for success in an uncertain world.

horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)

An initiative where two or more federal organizations are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.

non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)

Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.

performance (rendement)

What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.

performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)

A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.

performance reporting (production de rapports sur le rendement)

The process of communicating evidence‑based performance information. Performance reporting supports decision making, accountability and transparency.

plan (plan)

The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result.

planned spending (dépenses prévues)

For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates.

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)

Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.

program inventory (répertoire des programmes)

Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.

result (résultat)

A consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the organization’s influence.

statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)

Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.

target (cible)

A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.

voted expenditures (dépenses votées)

Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Institutional GBA+ Capacity

Date of Publishing:

Section 1: Institutional GBA+ Capacity

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency will continue initiatives to raise awareness among staff on how to incorporate GBA+ analytical processes into our work and decision-making, including initiatives led by the Champion for Employment Equity, Diversity and Inclusion.

In the year ahead, NSIRA will develop an employment equity strategy to increase representation and to ensure it reflects the diversity of the Canadian public. This will incorporate baseline data derived from employee self-identification.

NSIRA will analyze trends in complaints to identify potential biases and discrimination and to collect demographic data about complainants to assess whether certain population groups are more frequently involved in grievances with the security agencies.

NSIRA will continue to engage with diverse stakeholder groups to better understand concerns regarding the differential impacts of national security and intelligence activities.

NSIRA will promote training tools for staff to ensure that considerations related to GBA+ are incorporated into our work.

Highlights of GBA+ Results Reporting Capacity by Program

National security and intelligence reviews and complaints investigations

For each program in the department’s Program Inventory, answer the following questions:

  1. Does this program have impacts that support the pillars and goals of the Gender Results Framework? Yes. Access to justice.
  2. Does this program collect sufficient data to enable it to monitor and/or report program impacts by gender and diversity (GBA+)? No. NSIRA will analyze trends in complaints to identify potential biases and discrimination and to collect demographic data about complainants to assess whether certain population groups are more frequently involved in grievances with the security agencies.
Share this page
Date Modified:

Gender-Based Analysis Plus: 2019-20

Date of Publishing:

Introduction

The Government of Canada defines the term “gender-based analysis plus” (GBA+) as an analytical process used to help identify the potential impacts of policies, programs and services on diverse groups of women, men and non-binary people. The “plus” in GBA+ acknowledges that the gender-based analysis goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences. All individuals have multiple identity factors that intersect to make them who they are, for example, race, national and ethnic origin, Indigenous origin or identity, age, sexual orientation, socio-economic condition, place of residence and disability.

The Government of Canada is committed to supporting the full implementation of GBA+ across federal departments so that differential impacts on diverse groups of people are considered when policies, programs and legislation are developed.

More information on GBA+ is available on the GBA+ Portal in GCpedia.

Institutional GBA+ Capacity

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency’s (NSIRA’s) mandate includes the review of any activity carried out by a department or agency that relates to national security or intelligence, including issues related to bias and discrimination. Its mandate requires NSIRA to report publicly, in an unclassified manner, on its findings and recommendations.

NSIRA ensures that GBA+ considerations continue to be made, and that the entire agency is accountable for integrating GBA+ into its decision-making processes.

Highlights of GBA+ Results by Program

Investigation of complaints against the Canadian Security Intelligence Service

  • NSIRA systematically follows a well-documented process in all cases to ensure equal access to justice for all complainants.
  • NSIRA has begun to analyze trends in complaints to identify potential biases and discrimination and to collect demographic data about complainants to assess whether certain population groups are more frequently involved in grievances with the security agencies.
  • NSIRA’s staffing practices consider gender-based analysis plus objectives. NSIRA hired a diverse group of employees with a mix of experience and skills to fulfil its broad mandate. For the 2019–20 period, the number of women hired was more than twice that of men; nearly 20% of the total hires were members of visible minority groups. This breadth of experience and competencies provides the agency with high-quality, diverse advice and support.
  • NSIRA engages with a broad and diverse range of stakeholders and community groups to inform its review priorities, demystify the complaints investigation process, and help with recruiting an elite workforce.
Share this page
Date Modified:

Departmental Plan: 2020-2021

Meta data information

Cat. Number: PS106-6E-PDF
ISSN: 2563-0334

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency, 2020.

Date of Publishing:

Message from the Chair

It is an honour and a privilege to be named the inaugural Chair of the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA).

NSIRA is comprised of seven appointed members, working with a Secretariat with expertise in review, law, national security and policy. NSIRA has a mandate to review any Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to ensure that they are lawful, reasonable and necessary. NSIRA also investigates complaints from members of the public regarding national security agencies and activities. Its recent creation fills a longstanding gap in Canada’s national security architecture and significantly strengthens our framework for national security accountability.

NSIRA will report on its work through a variety of mechanisms. It is required to produce an unclassified annual report summarizing the full range of its activities, findings, and recommendations. This annual report is to be submitted to the Prime Minister and tabled in both Houses of Parliament. NSIRA is also required to submit annual reports to the Minister of Public Safety and the Minister of National Defence regarding the activities of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), respectively, as well as an additional annual report to the Minister of Public Safety regarding disclosures under the Security of Canada Information Disclosure Act (SCIDA). As the Chair of NSIRA, I am required on an annual basis to brief the Minister of Public Safety on CSIS’ exercise of its powers, duties and functions, and to do the same for the Minister of National Defence with respect to CSE.

NSIRA will also work with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) and the Privacy Commissioner on issues of common interest, to maximize both the effectiveness and the efficiency of national security review activities.

I am grateful for the support that I have received thus far in my new role, and I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues in the year ahead in fulfilling NSIRA’s important new mandate.

Murray Rankin, Q.C.

Chair, National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

Message from the Executive Director

It is my pleasure to submit the first Departmental Plan for the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency, for 2020-21.

During our first full year of operation, we will focus on transitioning to a much broader mandate, which now includes review of national security and intelligence activities across the Government of Canada, as well as the investigation of complaints related to CSIS, CSE, and national security complaints related to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

We will focus on building a strong network of partnerships to help us define our research priorities and deliver on our mandate in an increasingly complex national security environment. In doing so, we also want to be more transparent with Canadians. A longer term vision is being developed and will be articulated in greater detail in our forthcoming annual report. Ensuring a healthy work environment so that all employees feel valued and included is key to attaining this vision.

I hope that you find the information below useful in detailing how NSIRA is resourced and intends to fulfill its mandate in the year ahead.

John Davies
Executive Director

Plans at a glance

Established in July 2019, NSIRA represents a significant enhancement for national security accountability in Canada. NSIRA has a statutory mandate to review the activities of CSIS and CSE, as well as the national security and intelligence activities of all other federal departments and agencies. To fulfill its review mandate, NSIRA has unfettered access to classified information other than Cabinet confidences. In addition, NSIRA inherited the complaints investigation functions of the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC), which was responsible for hearing complaints from members of the public regarding the actions of CSIS, as well as those related to the revocation or denial of security clearances. Going forward, it will also hear complaints regarding the CSE, as well as national security-related complaints regarding the RCMP.

In its first full year of operations, NSIRA will focus on ensuring it transitions effectively to a much larger organization with a much broader mandate. This includes: securing new accommodations; effective staffing and knowledge development; establishing strong working relations with review partners and other Canadian review bodies; and, delivering on mandatory reporting requirements as noted in the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act. Going forward, as NSIRA’s institutional capacity adapts, reviews will grow in complexity and sophistication, with an increasing focus on inter-agency activities. A key planning tool to be developed is a three-year research plan. This plan will guide resource allocation and staffing decisions over the medium term.

NSIRA is committed to: openness and transparency to connect better with Canadians; methodological excellence to ensure the quality of our work; and, forward thinking and innovation, including how we consider the impacts of new technology and an ever-changing national security environment. NSIRA understands the importance of organizational health and wellness as fundamental to our success. As we act on these values, NSIRA expects to be well positioned to deliver on our mandate.

For more information on the NSIRA’s plans, priorities and planned results, see the “Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks” section of this report.

Core responsibilities: planned results and resources, and key risks

Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

Description

The Secretariat will assist NSIRA members in fulfilling the agency’s mandate. The Secretariat will conduct a range of activities to support the agency, including accessing relevant information and providing strategic and expert advice in the conduct of reviews, quasi-judicial investigation of complaints and the development of reports. It will also provide administrative support in arranging for briefings, hearings and consultations with stakeholders and international counterparts, and support to ensure compliance with security requirements.

Planning highlights

NSIRA will directly contribute to enhancing scrutiny of, and accountability for, national security and intelligence activities undertaken by Government of Canada institutions. This will increase public confidence that these activities are thoroughly reviewed and assessed as to whether they are lawful, reasonable and necessary.

Work in the year ahead will focus on adapting to NSIRA’s broad new mandate. This will involve building knowledge of the national security and intelligence activities of departments and agencies across the Government of Canada, in support of both the review and complaints investigations functions. Staffing new positions with high-quality candidates who can bring specialized knowledge and expertise to the organization will be a key priority.

NSIRA will carry out a number of activities in 2020-21 in support of its new mandate, including:

  • Supporting the development of reports, including on specific annual mandatory reviews and the NSIRA’s annual public report, which will be submitted to the Prime Minister;
  • Developing a medium-term research plan that reflects the broad scope of NSIRA’s new review mandate and the modern realities of inter-agency cooperation in the field of national security;
  • Working actively with its counterparts at the NSICOP, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, and the Office of the Intelligence Commissioner to foster productive collaboration within the Canadian review community;
  • Undertaking the investigation of complaints, updating procedures and establishing protocols in relation to the newly expanded aspects of this function;
  • Exploring ways to continue to build relationships with like-mandated international review bodies to participate in the exchange of best practices; and,
  • Enhancing NSIRA’s engagement with Canadians on matters of national security and intelligence in order to build public trust.

Gender-based analysis plus

NSIRA is committed to developing a diverse and inclusive workforce comprised of individuals with a broad range of backgrounds and perspectives. The NSIRA Secretariat recently issued its first employee survey to establish baselines on employee demographics as well as on matters related to workplace wellness. In the year ahead, a number of steps will be taken to follow up on this initiative and to foster an inclusive and positive work environment. Greater diversity in the workforce is an important staffing objective for the organization.

NSIRA is also mindful of the potential impact that national security and intelligence activities can have on diverse communities in Canada. This and related issues can arise in the context of reviews as well as complaints, and NSIRA has the authority to scrutinize national security and intelligence activities for signs of bias and discrimination.

In the year ahead, NSIRA will engage Canadians to discuss research planning and priorities, as well as findings and recommendations of interest, and to better understand concerns regarding differential impacts of national security and intelligence activities. This engagement will include a diverse range of stakeholder groups.

NSIRA is also aware of concerns about bias and unfair targeting in the context of new and emerging technologies. In the year ahead, we will work to better understand this issue and the implications that it entails for Canadians. We are also exploring training tools for NSIRA staff to ensure that considerations related to Gender-based analysis plus are incorporated into our review methodology.

Key risks

The ability to hire a sufficient number of qualified personnel within relevant timelines remains a short- and medium-term risk for NSIRA, particularly given the specialized knowledge and skillsets required for many positions. This is further compounded by the requirement for candidates to obtain a Top Secret security clearance, which can incur significant delays.

The ability to expand into additional secure accommodations in a timely manner is also a significant risk for NSIRA, given that its mandate requires it to operate within a high security zone. A lack of secure accommodations would negatively impact the ability of NSIRA to hire large numbers of staff, impeding its ability to deliver on its mandate.

The ability to ensure that NSIRA’s work is conducted in accordance with the highest security standards remains top-of-mind for the organization. In the year ahead, we will work to ensure that employees are aware of and abide by all relevant security protocols, while ensuring that our accommodations and information systems are fit-for-purpose. In this regard, we will work with the national security community to ensure that they have confidence in our approach.

The ability of NSIRA to access the information it needs to do its work and speak to the relevant internal stakeholders to understand policies, operations and ongoing issues is closely tied to the reviewed departments’ capacity to respond to the demands of NSIRA. The resource constraints of the reviewed departments could delay NSIRA’s ability to deliver on its mandate in a timely way.

Mitigation measures for the risks outlined above will be developed and factored into NSIRA’s work throughout the year ahead.

Planned results for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is under development. Additional information on key performance measures will be included in the 2021- 22 Departmental Plan.

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned budgetary financial resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2020–21 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2020–21 planned spending 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending
11,309,411 11,309,411 12,107,192 13,842,015

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Planned human resources for assisting the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

2020–21 planned full-time equivalents 2021–22 planned full-time equivalents 2022–23 planned full-time equivalents
48 75 75

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Internal Services: planned results

Description

Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of Programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal Services refers to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct services that support Program delivery in the organization, regardless of the Internal Services delivery model in a department. These services are:

  • Management and Oversight Services
  • Communications Services
  • Legal Services
  • Human Resources Management Services
  • Financial Management Services
  • Information Management Services
  • Information Technology Services
  • Real Property Management Services
  • Materiel Management Services
  • Acquisition Management Services

Planning highlights

In this first full year of operations, NSIRA will focus on expanding into additional secure facilities and on staffing vacant positions. The Secretariat is working with officials from the Privy Council Office and Public Services and Procurement Canada to identify opportunities for expansion into an additional high security zone, as well as opportunities to retrofit existing spaces for eventual occupation. On the issue of human resources, the Secretariat is recruiting with a view to ensuring that new staff are diverse and have the necessary skills and core competencies that will provide NSIRA with high-quality support it requires over the long term.

The Secretariat will also work to ensure that staff are equipped with the necessary Information Management/Information Technology (IM/IT) systems, equipment and support services to perform their work, as the organization grows.

Planned budgetary financial resources for Internal Services

2020–21 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2020–21 planned spending 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending
12,975,559 12,975,559 12,107,192 4,614,005

Funding for 2020-21 and 2021-22 is higher than ongoing funding figures due to plans for funds being used for the building and refurbishing of additional office space.

Planned human resources for Internal Services

2020–21 planned full-time equivalents 2021–22 planned full-time equivalents 2022–23 planned full-time equivalents
22 25 25

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Spending and human resources

This section provides an overview of the department’s planned spending and human resources for the next three consecutive fiscal years, and compares planned spending for the upcoming year with the current year’s spending.

Planned spending

Departmental spending 2017–18 to 2022–23

The following graph presents planned (voted and statutory) spending over time.

The figures in the graph above reflect the fact that NSIRA was established part-way through the 2019-20 fiscal year, with a coming-into-force date of July 12, 2019. Fiscal Year 2019-20 presents forecast spending for the current fiscal year. Fiscal years 2020-21 to 2022-23 present planned spending based on approved authorities. The planned spending for 2020-21 and 2021-22 includes funding for construction and fit-up of secure office space required by NSIRA for its activities.

Budgetary planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services (dollars)

The following table shows actual, forecast and planned spending for NSIRA’s core responsibility and for Internal Services for the years relevant to the current planning year.

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2017–18 expenditures 2018–19 expenditures 2019–20 forecast spending 2020–21 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) 2020–21 planned spending 2021–22 planned spending 2022–23 planned spending
National Security and Intelligence Reviews and Complaints Investigations N/A N/A 2,964,990 11,309,411 11,309,411 12,107,192 13,842,015
Subtotal N/A N/A 2,964,990 11,309,411 11,309,411 12,107,192 13,842,015
Internal Services N/A N/A 4,984,840 12,975,559 12,975,559 12,107,192 4,614,005
Total N/A N/A 7,949,830 24,284,970 24,284,970 24,214,384 18,456,020

As NSIRA was created on July 12, 2019, there is no comparative information to provide for prior years. Numbers for 2019-20 are for the reporting period July 12, 2019 – March 31, 2020.

Due to delays in acquiring and fitting up a second office site for the growing organization, NSIRA is expected to lapse funds, allocated for construction and equipping office space in 2019-20. Planned spending for 2022-23 shows the ongoing financial authorities after completion of the office expansion project.

Planned human resources

The following table shows actual, forecast and planned full-time equivalents (FTEs) for the core responsibility in NSIRA’s departmental results framework and for Internal Services for the years relevant to the current planning year.

Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services

Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2017-18 Actual full-time equivalents 2018-19 Actual full-time equivalents 2019-20 Forecast full-time equivalents 2020-21 Planned full-time equivalents 2021-22 Planned full-time equivalents 2022-23 Planned full-time equivalents
Assist the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency N/A N/A 24 48 75 75
Subtotal N/A N/A 24 48 75 75
Internal Services N/A N/A 15 22 25 25
Total N/A N/A 39 70 100 100

Accommodations challenges as well as security clearance requirements pushed anticipated staffing actions to future reporting periods. As NSIRA evolves, it will need to prioritize staffing efforts in order to fulfill its expanded mandate.

Estimates by vote

Information on NSIRA’s organizational appropriations is available in the 2020–21 Main Estimates.

Condensed future-oriented statement of operations

The condensed future-oriented statement of operations provides an overview of NSIRA’s operations for 2019–20 to 2020–21.

The amounts for forecast and planned results in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The amounts for forecast and planned spending presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.

A more detailed future-oriented statement of operations and associated notes, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations to the requested authorities, are available on NSIRA’s website.

Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services

Financial information 2019-20 Forecast results 2020-21 Planned results Difference (2020-21 planned results minus 2019-20 Forecast results)
Total expenses 8,924,002 25,780,059 16,856,058
Total revenues 248 248 0
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 8,923,754 25,779,811 16,856,058

The large increase between planned results for 2020-21 and forecasted results for 2019-20 is due to the later-than-expected royal assent of the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act and the coming-into-force of the NSIRA. The difference has been further compounded by the challenge of finding suitable highly secure accommodations and the resulting inability to complete planned hiring in 2019-20.

Corporate Information

Organizational profile

Appropriate minister: The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada
Institutional head: John Davies, Executive Director
Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office
Enabling instrument: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act
Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do

“Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do” is available on NSIRA‘s website.

Operating context

Information on the operating context is available on NSIRA’s website.

Reporting framework

NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is under development. Additional information on key performance measures will be included in the 2021- 22 Departmental Plan.

Supporting information on the program inventory

Supporting information on planned expenditures, human resources, and results related to NSIRA’s program inventory is available in the GC InfoBase.

Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on NSIRA‘s website.

  • Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy
  • Gender-based analysis plus

Federal tax expenditures

NSIRA’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures that relate to its planned results for 2020–21.

Tax expenditures are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance, and the Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for government-wide tax expenditures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures. This report provides detailed information on tax expenditures, including objectives, historical background and references to related federal spending programs, as well as evaluations, research papers and gender-based analysis. The tax measures presented in this report are solely the responsibility of the Minister of Finance.

Organizational contact information

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
P.O. Box 2430, Station “D” Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5W5


Fax: 613-907-4445
Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
Website: www.nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Appendix: definitions

appropriation (crédit)

Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)

Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.

core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)

An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.

Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)

A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3‑year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring.

departmental priority (priorité)

A plan or project that a department has chosen to focus and report on during the planning period. Priorities represent the things that are most important or what must be done first to support the achievement of the desired departmental results.

departmental result (résultat ministériel)

A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.

departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)

A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.

departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)

A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.

Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)

A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.

experimentation (expérimentation)

The conducting of activities that seek to first explore, then test and compare the effects and impacts of policies and interventions in order to inform evidence-based decision-making, and improve outcomes for Canadians, by learning what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Experimentation is related to, but distinct from innovation (the trying of new things), because it involves a rigorous comparison of results. For example, using a new website to communicate with Canadians can be an innovation; systematically testing the new website against existing outreach tools or an old website to see which one leads to more engagement, is experimentation.

full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)

A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full‑time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.

gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])

An analytical process used to assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people experience policies, programs and services based on multiple factors including race ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.

government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)

For the purpose of the 2020–21 Departmental Results Report, those high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2019 Speech from the Throne, namely: Fighting climate change; Strengthening the Middle Class; Walking the road of reconciliation; Keeping Canadians safe and healthy; and Positioning Canada for success in an uncertain world.

horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)

An initiative where two or more federal organizations are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.

non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)

Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.

performance (rendement)

What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.

performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)

A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.

performance reporting (production de rapports sur le rendement)

The process of communicating evidence‑based performance information. Performance reporting supports decision making, accountability and transparency.

plan (plan)

The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result.

planned spending (dépenses prévues)

For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates.

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)

Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.

program inventory (répertoire des programmes)

Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.

result (résultat)

A consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the organization’s influence.

statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)

Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.

target (cible)

A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.

voted expenditures (dépenses votées)

Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Share this page
Date Modified:

Departmental Results Report: 2019-20

Meta data information

Cat. Number: PS106-8E-PDF
ISSN: 2563-5174

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020

Date of Publishing:

Message from the Executive Director

The National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) experienced significant growth and transformation in the 2019-20 fiscal year. With the coming into force of the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act in July 2019, our focus has been on transitioning the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) to an organization with a much broader mandate.

This has involved hiring and accommodating the talent required to deliver NSIRA’s expansive mandate, roughly doubling the staff complement throughout the fiscal year. It also has involved scaling up physical, personnel and information security practices, and implementing new policies and procedures for pay and finance systems.

In our first year, we have established strong working relationships with organizations newly subject to review. We have also worked to ensure effective collaboration with other accountability bodies, such as the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, and the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP. These relationships will continue to serve our respective organizations well in the management of complaints investigations and as the review agenda grows in complexity and sophistication, with an increasing focus on interagency activities. To this end, 2019-20 marked the establishment of NSIRA’s first three-year review plan, which reflects the broader scope of NSIRA’s review mandate.

With respect to complaints investigations, NSIRA’s mandate expanded from complaints related to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to include complaints related to the Communications Security Establishment and, where there is a close nexus to national security, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Work in 2019-20 included updating procedures and establishing protocols for the new aspects of this function. Our work reforming the complaints investigations process so that it is more timely and more accessible to the public will continue into 2020-21.

NSIRA’s core values centre on public engagement and transparency. With the support of staff, NSIRA members held numerous outreach and stakeholder engagement sessions in 2019-20, including to explain our new mandate, learn about stakeholder priorities and demystify the complaints process. NSIRA also began releasing online redacted versions of SIRC reports that had previously been released to applicants under the Access to Information Act. Our intention is to enhance public dialogue on issues related to national security and intelligence. Going forward, NSIRA is committed to proactively, in consultation with relevant ministers, redacting and releasing our reviews as they are completed throughout the year.

I am extremely proud of the way that NSIRA staff have adapted to NSIRA’s expanded mandate, and of the professionalism, objectivity and energy that they bring to their work, even more so during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. I wish to thank NSIRA staff for their continued commitment to and flexibility regarding new work arrangements during this especially challenging time.

I am confident that this enthusiasm and hard work will find us in good stead in the year ahead as we continue to expand our corporate infrastructure to facilitate growth, and as we embark on an ambitious agenda of review, complaints investigation and stakeholder engagement.

John Davies
Executive Director
National Security and Intelligence Review Agency

Results at a glance and operating context

Actual spending

2019-20 : $6,921,056

Actual human resources

2019–20 full-time equivalents : 36.9

The total actual spending and actual human resources used over fiscal year 2019-20 comprises resources spent and used by SIRC until July 2019 and by its successor NSIRA from July 12, 2019, until year-end.

On July 12, 2019, Canada’s framework for national security accountability underwent a major transformation with the creation of the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA), the coming into force of the NSIRA Act and by the earlier passage of Bill-C59 – National Security Act, 2017.

Although NSIRA inherited some corporate infrastructure from SIRC, NSIRA’s mandate extends far beyond SIRC’s focus on activities performed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). NSIRA is an independent organization mandated to review all Government of Canada national security and intelligence activities to assess whether they are lawful, comply with ministerial direction, reasonable and necessary.

NSIRA’s complaints investigation mandate also extends beyond CSIS, to include complaints regarding the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), as well as complaints related to national security activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

With these significant changes taking effect in 2019-20, activities have mainly focused on establishing the necessary foundation for delivering on the expanded mandate.

Some of the key results achieved over the course of 2019-20 by SIRC and NSIRA include the following:

  • Better inform Canadians and Parliamentarians

To reflect its expanded mandate, NSIRA created new teams to build capacity in reviewing all of the federal departments and agencies engaged in national security and intelligence activities.

This fiscal year, NSIRA approved and completed five reviews: three focused on CSIS activities; one was a review of CSE activities; and one was the first NSIRA interdepartmental review, which examined how six federal departments implemented ministerial direction. NSIRA developed a risk-based approach for choosing the subjects of reviews to ensure close and continuous scrutiny of high-risk areas, emerging threats, intelligence priorities and activities identified in the course of the reviews. NSIRA also adopted a longer-term approach to planning its reviews and developed a three-year evidence-based, comprehensive review plan, to ensure that programs and activities span the entire national security and intelligence community and will better inform Canadians and parliamentarians. The NSIRA members approved the review plan in February 2020. During the course of this fiscal year, NSIRA also took steps toward redacting SIRC’s classified reviews and translating them, in preparation for publication on its website.

Finally, NSIRA’s Chair continued to engage with ministers and departments and agencies at senior levels. As well, NSIRA briefed the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the Minister of National Defence both verbally and in writing, as required under the NSIRA Act.

  • Continue to improve access to justice

The process for the investigation of complaints is continuously being refined and streamlined through the implementation of best practices and procedures to promote access to justice and ensure timeliness in the conduct of investigations. On receiving its mandate, NSIRA continued to build on SIRC’s knowledge while expanding the complaints investigation process to include investigations of complaints related to CSE and complaints referred to it by the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP. This fiscal year, NSIRA finalized two investigations that SIRC had started; one recommendation was issued with respect to CSIS’s actions.

Staffing was a main priority over the course of 2019–20 in anticipation of NSIRA’s needs under its mandate. NSIRA was able to attract many talented reviewers, lawyers, and support staff to position it for success in 2020.

For more information on NSIRA’s plans, priorities and results achieved, see the “Results: what we achieved” section of this report.

Results: what we achieved

The core responsibility, description and results reported here are specific to SIRC. Although SIRC became NSIRA partway through the 2019-20 fiscal year, NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is still being developed. It will be implemented starting in 2021-22. Consequently, 2019-20 actual results for NSIRA are not available. Nonetheless, this section also describes NSIRA’s efforts to establish a strong foundation for executing its mandate.

Core responsibility

Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities

Description:

SIRC is an external independent review body responsible for: reviewing the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to determine whether its operational activities complied with the law and ministerial direction; investigating complaints by any person about any action of the Service, including denials of security clearances; and, certifying the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director’s annual report to the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness to determine whether any activities were not authorized, contravened ministerial direction, or involved any unreasonable or unnecessary exercise of powers. SIRC makes findings and, where appropriate, recommendations designed to improve performance and prevent non-compliance. The results of this work, edited to protect national security and personal privacy, are summarized in an annual report, which is tabled in Parliament by the Minister.

Results:

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service complies with the law and its actions are reasonable and necessary.

With SIRC dissolving in June 2019, actual 2019-20 results are not available. NSIRA will be implementing a new Departmental Results Framework starting in 2021-22.

Review of national security and intelligence activities and outreach

Between April 1, 2019, and July 12, 2019, three in-depth reviews of CSIS activities were undertaken. These reviews were completed and approved by NSIRA in Fall 2019. These reviews examined a cross-section of national security and intelligence activities, including internal security, intelligence collection and disposal, and information sharing.

In December 2019, NSIRA completed its first review of CSE; and in February 2020, NSIRA’s first interdepartmental review was finalized, which focused on the implementation of a ministerial direction by several federal departments and agencies.

To maximize coverage and understanding of the national security and intelligence community in Canada, NSIRA members and NSIRA staff actively engaged with a range of government and non-governmental partners including academics and civil society representatives. NSIRA also continued to build relationships with counterpart organizations, including the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

Investigation of complaints against the Canadian Security Intelligence Service

Between April 1, 2019, and July 12, 2019, SIRC issued one final report regarding a complaint investigation against CSIS. The report did not contain any recommendations and the complaint was dismissed.

As of July 12, 2019, NSIRA took over SIRC’s investigations process. Outstanding complaints and new complaints received were processed as quickly as possible. This included informal resolution efforts and quasi-judicial hearings when necessary.

The investigation process relies heavily on its information resources to effectively fulfil its mandate. This year, NSIRA strengthened processes and procedures to improve information management and increase effectiveness.

Gender-based analysis plus

The new NSIRA mandate includes review of any activity carried out by a department or agency that relates to national security or intelligence, including issues related to bias and discrimination. Its mandate also requires NSIRA to report publicly, in an unclassified manner, on its findings and recommendations.

In complaints investigations, NSIRA systematically follows a well-documented process in all cases to ensure equal access to justice for all complainants. NSIRA has also begun to analyze trends in complaints to identify potential biases and discrimination and to collect demographic data about complainants. The aim is to assess whether certain population groups are more frequently involved in grievances with the security agencies.

NSIRA’s staffing practices consider gender-based analysis plus objectives. NSIRA hired a diverse group of employees with a mix of experience and skills to fulfil its broad mandate. For the 2019-20 period, the number of women hired was more than twice that of men; nearly 20% of the total hires were members of visible minority groups. This breadth of experience and competencies provides the agency with high-quality, non-partisan advice and support.

Furthermore, NSIRA engages with a broad and diverse range of stakeholders and community groups to inform its review priorities, demystify the complaints investigation process, and help with recruiting an elite workforce.

Experimentation

Given the functions and responsibilities of SIRC and NSIRA, the agencies did not pursue experimentation activities.

Results achieved
Departmental results  Performance indicators  Target Date to achieve target 2017–18 Actual results 2018–19 Actual results 2019–20 Actual results*
* SIRC’s changeover to NSIRA requires significant changes to the Departmental Results Framework, expected results and indicators. Consequently, 2019–20 actual results for NSIRA are not available. NSIRA will implement a new Departmental Results Framework starting in 2021–22.
CSIS complies with the law and its actions are reasonable and necessary Percentage of high- and medium-risk operational activities reviewed annually 80% 2019–20 79% 86% Not applicable (N/A)
Degree to which the parties to complaints are satisfied with the complaints process N/A 2022–23 N/A N/A N/A
Percentage of recommendations accepted by CSIS 90% 2018–19 95.7% N/A N/A
Percentage of recommendations advanced by CSIS 80% 2019–20 66.7% 82% N/A
Budgetary financial resources (dollars)
Departmental results  Performance indicators  Target Date to achieve target 2017–18 Actual results 2018–19 Actual results 2019–20 Actual results*
* Actual spending in 2019–20 can be broken down by agency as follows:
  • SIRC: $814,874
  • NSIRA: $3,009,066
CSIS complies with the law and its actions are reasonable and necessary Percentage of high- and medium-risk operational activities reviewed annually 80% 2019–20 79% 86% Not applicable (N/A)
Degree to which the parties to complaints are satisfied with the complaints process N/A 2022–23 N/A N/A N/A
Percentage of recommendations accepted by CSIS 90% 2018–19 95.7% N/A N/A
Percentage of recommendations advanced by CSIS 80% 2019–20 66.7% 82% N/A

Financial authorities were transferred from SIRC to NSIRA in 2019–20.

Human resources (full-time equivalents)
2019–20 Planned full-time equivalents 2019–20 Actual full-time equivalents 2019–20 Difference (Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)
* Actual spending in 2019–20 can be broken down by agency as follows:
  • SIRC: 4.8
  • NSIRA: 17.5
24.5 22.3* (2.2)

SIRC’s current staff carried over to NSIRA and formed the basis of the new NSIRA.

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s Program Inventory is available in GC InfoBase.

Internal Services

Description

Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal Services refers to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct service categories that support Program delivery in the organization, regardless of the Internal Services delivery model in a department. The 10 service categories are:

  • Acquisition Management Services
  • Communication Services
  • Financial Management Services
  • Human Resources Management Services
  • Information Management Services
  • Information Technology Services
  • Legal Services
  • Material Management Services
  • Management and Oversight Services
  • Real Property Management Services

Results

Over the course of 2019-20, the priority of internal services functions has been ensuring the successful transition from SIRC to NSIRA. This involved overhauling existing or developing new human resources, financial, accommodation and security policies, practices and systems.

Budgetary financial resources (dollars)
2019-20 Main Estimates 2019-20 Planned spending 2019-20 Total authorities available for use 2019-20 Actual spending (authorities used) 2019-20 Difference (Actual spending minus Planned spending)
* Actual spending in 2019–20 can be broken down by agency as follows:
  • SIRC: $480,875
  • NSIRA: $2,616,241
1,402,384 1,402,384 16,624,630 3,097,116* 1,694,732

Financial authorities were transferred from SIRC to NSIRA in 2019–20.

Human resources (full-time equivalents)
2019–20 Planned full-time equivalents 2019–20 Actual full-time equivalents 2019–20 Difference (Actual full-time equivalents minus Planned full-time equivalents)
* Actual spending in 2019–20 can be broken down by agency as follows:
  • SIRC: 3.5
  • NSIRA: 11.2
7.5 14.7* 7.1

SIRC’s current staff carried over to NSIRA and formed the basis of the new NSIRA.

Actual expenditures

Departmental spending trend graph

The following graph presents planned (voted and statutory spending) over time.

Graph: Departmental spending trend - Text version follows
Departmental spending trend graph
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Statutory 332,840 357,096 517,233 1,483,914 1,704,632 1,704,632
Voted 5,841,352 4,635,457 6,403,823 22,801,056 22,509,752 16,751,388
Total 6,174,192 4,992,553 6,921,056 24,284,970 24,214,384 18,456,020

The graph illustrates SIRC’s and NSIRA’s spending trend over a six-year period from 2017-18 to 2022-23. Fiscal years 2017-18 to 2019-20 reflect the organization’s actual expenditures as reported in the Public Accounts. Fiscal years 2020-21 to 2022-23 represent planned spending.

The decrease of $1.2 million in spending from 2017-18 to 2018-19 is mainly explained by the SIRC relocation project, including the information management/information technology modernization project in 2017-18. SIRC changed office space at the end of fiscal year 2017-18.

The increase from 2018-19 to 2019-20 is mainly explained by the cost of additional resources hired as part of the transition from SIRC to NSIRA.

The variance between actual spending in 2019-20 and planned spending for 2020-21 is due to the timing of the approval of the NSIRA Act and the creation of NSIRA, as well as delays in the identification of a short- and long-term accommodation strategy. These delays held back accommodation, infrastructure and system projects required to support NSIRA’s mandate.

The increase is also attributable to a year-over-year increase in spending authorities for NSIRA’s new, broader mandate. Starting in fiscal year 2022-23, NSIRA’s planned spending will decrease by almost $6.0 million due to the sunset of some of the funding for new office space.

Budgetary performance summary for core responsibilities and Internal Services (dollars)

SIRC
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2019-20 Main Estimates 2019-20 Planned spending 2020-21 Planned spending 2021-22 Planned spending 2019-20 Total authorities available for use 2017-18 Actual spending (authorities used) 2018-19 Actual spending (authorities used) 2019-20 Actual spending (authorities used)
Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities 3,752,433 3,752,433 0 0 815,364 2,894,198 2,648,567 814,874
Subtotal 3,752,433 3,752,433 0 0 815,364 2,894,198 2,648,567 814,874
Internal Services 1,402,384 1,402,384 0 0 480,875 3,279,994 2,343,986 480,875
Total 5,154,817 5,154,817 0 0 1,296,239 6,174,192 4,992,553 1,295,749
NSIRA
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2019-20 Main Estimates 2019-20 Planned spending 2020-21 Planned spending 2021-22 Planned spending 2019-20 Total authorities available for use 2017-18 Actual spending (authorities used) 2018-19 Actual spending (authorities used) 2019-20 Actual spending (authorities used)
Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities 0 0 11,309,411 12,107,192 6,695,628 0 0 3,009,066
Subtotal 0 0 11,309,411 12,107,192 6,695,628 0 0 3,009,066
Internal Services 0 0 12,975,559 12,107,192 16,143,755 0 0 2,616,241
Total 0 0 24,284,970 24,214,384 22,839,383 0 0 5,625,307

Actual human resources

Human resources summary for Core Responsibilities and Internal Services

SIRC
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2017-18 Actual full-time equivalents 2018-19 Actual full-time equivalents 2019-20 Planned full-time equivalents 2019-20 Actual full-time equivalents 2020-21 Planned full-time equivalents 2021-22 Planned full-time equivalents
Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities 18.7 18.1 24.5 4.8 0.0 0.0
Subtotal 18.7 18.1 24.5 4.8 0.0 0.0
Internal Services 10.0 10.8 7.5 3.5 0.0 0.0
Total 28.7 28.9 32.0 8.3 0.0 0.0
NSIRA
Core responsibilities and Internal Services 2017-18 Actual full-time equivalents 2018-19 Actual full-time equivalents 2019-20 Planned full-time equivalents 2019-20 Actual full-time equivalents 2020-21 Planned full-time equivalents 2021-22 Planned full-time equivalents
*Over the course of 2019-20, funding for an additional 26 FTEs was received to account for the expanded mandate of NSIRA. These FTEs are not accounted for in the planned 2019-20 FTEs.
Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 48.0 75.0
Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 48.0 75.0
Internal Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 22.0 25.0
Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 70.0 100.0

In the next two years, NSIRA will be focused on hiring up to 100 FTEs to deliver on its new mandate.

Expenditures by vote

For information on NSIRA’s organizational voted and statutory expenditures, consult the Public Accounts of Canada 2019-2020.

Government of Canada spending and activities

Information on the alignment of NSIRA’s spending with the Government of Canada’s spending and activities is available in GC InfoBase.

Financial statements and financial statements highlights

Financial statements

SIRC’s and NSIRA’s financial statements (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2019, are available on NSIRA‘s website.

Financial statement highlights

Condensed Statement of Operations (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2020 (dollars)
SIRC
Financial information 2019-20 Planned results 2019-20 Actual results 2018-19 Actual results Difference (2019-20 Actual results minus 2019-20 Planned results) Difference (2019-20 Actual results minus 2018-19 Actual results)
Total expenses 6,074,207 1,723,632 5,539,131 (4,350,575) (3,815,499)
Total revenues 0 0 (490) 0 490
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 6,074,207 1,723,632 5,538,642 (4,350,575) (3,815,010)
NSIRA
Financial information 2019-20 Planned results 2019-20 Actual results 2018-19 Actual results Difference (2019-20 Actual results minus 2019-20 Planned results) Difference (2019-20 Actual results minus 2018-19 Actual results)
Total expenses 0 6,330,487 0 6,330,487 6,330,487
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 0
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 0 6,330,487 0 6,330,487 6,330,487

Difference between 2018-19 actual results and 2019-20 actual results:

The agency’s actual net cost of operations before government funding and transfer for 2019-20, as compared with 2018-19, increased primarily as a result of the transition from SIRC to NSIRA and the additional resources hired to support NSIRA’s new mandate.

Difference between 2019-20 actual results and 2019-20 planned results:

The agency’s actual net cost of operations from continuing activities was higher than the planned results for the fiscal year as a result of the transition from SIRC to NSIRA.

Condensed Statement of Financial Position (unaudited) as of March 31, 2020 (dollars)
SIRC
Financial information 2019-20 2018-19 Difference (2019-20 minus 2018-19)
Total net liabilities 1,412,420 1,494,816 (82,396)
Total net financial assets 1,315,658 1,355,974 (40,316)
Departmental net debt 96,762 138,843 (42,081)
Total non-financial assets 80,751 1,399,684 (1,318,933)
Departmental net financial position (16,011) 1,260,841 (1,276,852)
NSIRA
Financial information 2019-20 2018-19 Difference (2019-20 minus 2018-19)
Total net liabilities 2,029,928 0 2,029,928
Total net financial assets 1,627,351 0 1,627,351
Departmental net debt 402,577 0 402,577
Total non-financial assets 1,075,318 0 1,075,318
Departmental net financial position 672,741 0 672,741

In 2019-20, the agency’s net liabilities and net financial assets increased primarily due to the transition from SIRC to NSIRA.

Additional information

Organizational profile

Appropriate minister: The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

Institutional head: John Davies, Executive Director

Ministerial portfolio: Privy Council Office

Enabling instrument: National Security and Intelligence Review Agency Act

Year of incorporation / commencement: 2019

Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do

“Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do” is available on NSIRA‘s website.

Reporting framework

SIRC’s Departmental Results Framework and Program Inventory of record for 2019-20 are shown below.

Graphical presentation: Departmental Reporting Framework and Program Inventory - Text version follows
Core Responsibility: Investigations of Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ operational activities
Departmental Results Framework CSIS complies with the law and its actions are reasonable and necessary Indicator: Percentage of high- and medium-risk operational activities reviewed annually Internal Services
Indicator: Degree to which the parties to complaints are satisfied with the complaints process
Indicator: Percentage of recommendations accepted by CSIS
Indicator: Percentage of recommendations accepted by CSIS
Program Inventory Program: Review of CSIS operations
Program: Investigation of complaints against the CSIS

SIRC became NSIRA partway through the 2019-20 fiscal year. NSIRA’s Departmental Results Framework, with accompanying results and indicators, is under development. Additional information on key performance measures will be included in the 2021-22 Departmental Plan.

Supporting information on the program inventory

Financial, human resources and performance information for NSIRA’s Program Inventory is available in GC InfoBase.

Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on NSIRA‘s website.

  • Gender-based analysis plus

Federal tax expenditures

The tax system can be used to achieve public policy objectives through the application of special measures such as low tax rates, exemptions, deductions, deferrals and credits. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for these measures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures. This report also provides detailed background information on tax expenditures, including descriptions, objectives, historical information and references to related federal spending programs. The tax measures presented in this report are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance.

Organizational contact information

National Security and Intelligence Review Agency
P.O. Box 2430, Station “D”
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5W5

The phone number is temporarily disabled
Fax: 613-907-4445

Email: info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca
Website: www.nsira-ossnr.gc.ca

Share this page
Date Modified: